Answer: The World Trade Center Towers fell on September
11.2001
Explanation: Please don't simply copy and paste your questions; sometimes the formatting goes all wacko, like it did here. Also, double-check that ALL the information pertaining to the question is included; I'm not entirely sure that this answer is correct, due to the fact that there is no "line" to even read. :)
Kenneth spent $62.52 because since he spent 58.98 dollars right? your going to add 3.54 dollars to the 58.98.
Answer:
I believe the best answers are:
blank 1 -- C) that has
blank 2 -- A) NO CHANGE
Explanation:
The original sentence, "...the US government has the power to take custody of land when having historical significance or great natural beauty" is a bit ambiguous. Who has historical significance? We assume it is the land. But, in the way it is phrased, it could also be the government. To eliminate such ambiguity, the best option is letter C) that has. It will help determine a certain land can be taken. What land? The one that has historical significance.
As for the sentence, "The designation of a territory as a national park, national monument, or other types of protected area can limit activities," I don't see any reasons for changes. Especially because of the word "other", which needs to be completed by a plural noun - eliminating options B and C. Letter D wouldn't be incorrect, but the transformation of "protected area" into an adjective for "types" is unnecessary. The sentence is perfect the way it is and, therefore, needs NO CHANGE.
The difference between science and pseudoscience is that science organizes knowledge in testable explanations and predictions about the universe while a pseudoscience is is a claim or a belief which is carried out as scientific but has no valid [ scientific method, not reliably tested. ]
Psychology is considered a social science, yet it has foundations in the natural sciences.
Psychology is considered a social science, yet it has foundations in the natural sciences.
Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are not correct, as the exclusivity contract that Koko Marius signed was not yet over.
You did not show the text to which this question refers, but through questions similar to yours, we can see that this question refers to the text presented in the figure below.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Koko Marius signed the exclusive contract with the JiMing Company of his own free will.
- This contract required the exclusivity of one year of work, which is a rational and legal period.
- In this case, Koko Marius cannot justify breaking the contract because he was seeking professional growth, as he could legally do so after a short period.
In this case, we can affirm that Koko Marius and Xiao Long Company are incorrect regarding the breach of contract, since, under the law, this breach of contract was illegal.
More information:
brainly.com/question/12790234?referrer=searchResults
