Your question is incomplete because it not does not provide the options to choose from, which are the following:
It misuses a statistic to overstate the amount of crime committed in New York City.
It assumes that because one person commits a crime, others will do so as well.
It uses an incorrect appeal to the New York Police Department as an authority.
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Answer:
It assumes that the police policy was the cause of the drop in crime.
Explanation:
In the passage, the speaker does not mention any other causes which may have lead to the reduction of crime in New York City, such as a rise in employment, education and better quality of life. As a consequence, the speaker takes for granted that the only reason for the decrease of the crime rate is the stop-and-frisk policy, which he or she believes should be continued.
Answer:
c.
Explanation:
it's only talking about parents when children could benefit from it As well
Answer:
The website address provides clues about the expertise of authors.
Explanation:
Passive. Assumably, they aren't intently listening, only to relax
That, which was at the core of Nathan and Rukmani’s marriage is: D. Suffering.
Suffering was a central theme in the union between Nathan and Rukmani. In the story, we learn that the union was sealed when Rukmani was only twelve years old.
She bore a girl child to Nathan within a year of their marriage. After that, she found it difficult to conceive for several years.
Later, she visited Kenny a fertility doctor who worked on her and helped her to conceive five sons for Nathan.
What followed was intense suffering for this family. Hunger and poverty ravished them. The same line of events occurred in the life of their first daughter, Ira.
Learn more about Nectar in a Sieve here:
brainly.com/question/1617405
