<u>s</u><u>t</u><u>e</u><u>p</u><u> </u><u>1</u><u> </u><u>introduction</u><u> </u>
<u>Step 2- Committee Consideration: ... </u>
<u>Step 3- Committee Action: ... </u>
<u>Step 4- Subcommittee Review: ...</u>
<u> Step 5- Mark Up: ... </u>
<u>Step 6- Committee Action – Reporting a Bill: ... </u>
<u>Step 7- Publication of Committee Report: ... </u>
<u>Step 8- Scheduling Floor Action:</u>
Answer:
It was an oil-exporting nation.
Explanation:
During the 1980s, the Soviet Union saw a severe downturn in oil prices. This, in turn, led to a decrease in production. Between 1988 and 1995, the oil production of the nation dropped by almost 50%. During this time period, oil was one of the main exports of the Soviet Union, which meant that these fluctuations in price greatly damaged its economy. Moreover, the damage to the economy weakened the nation, allowing for the change of regime to take place.
Answer:
As a contested term, globalization has many definitions, each worthy of merit. Generally, globalization is first thought of “in economic and political terms, as a movement of capitalism spreading across the globe.”[1] It calls to mind “homogenizing exports of the US” such as Nike, McDonald’s, and MTV.[2] However, since globalization can be defined as a process of an “ever more interdependent world”[3] where “political, economic, social, and cultural relationships are not restricted to territorial boundaries or to state actors,” globalization has much do with its impact on cultures.[4]
Explanation:
can i get brainliest???
According to the research that I made, this is the passage that explains why the book entitled “The Sellout” by Paul Beatty won the Booker Prize and it is because of its content which is about the privilege of white male.
Answer:
The electoral college system was the best solution they chose to democratically elect a president in a way that was both consistent with republican values and with the protections of rights of smaller states.
Explanation:
The Constitution and the new laws in the United States were revolutionary and pioneering by the end of the 18th century. The Founding Fathers could not look at a previous democratic model to find inspiration, because autocracy was the system of government anywhere else. One of the great dilemmas of democracy is how to avoid the tyranny of majorities over minorities. Could they have thought of a better system then? Maybe it was possible in theory, but it was very hard in practice. Besides, the population of the fomer colonies wasn´t as large as it´s today, and there were only 13 states, not 50. They could hardly have envision some outcomes we´ve seen in recent years when some candidates have won the popular vote, but have failed to win key states and electoral votes. They chose what they saw as the best option.
