1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
7nadin3 [17]
3 years ago
9

The ideas of the enlightenment encouraged people's of the new United States to:

History
1 answer:
Morgarella [4.7K]3 years ago
8 0
B. Form a government based on law and reason
You might be interested in
What subjects from ancient times did humanists study and explore ?
mojhsa [17]
Humanists studied and explored ancient art, architecture, government, history, poetry, and language
4 0
3 years ago
Which describes the work of an archaeologist? A. studies ancient languages B. studies legal documents C. studies man-made materi
harina [27]
C. is the answer.  Archaeologists studies the things that are man made or fossilized from the past.  Like Indiana Jones!

D.  would be an anthropologist.  That is someone who studies traditions and customs.  No matter the time period.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
The Congress of Vienna led to revolts in France because
USPshnik [31]
Well, your answer is going to be <span>many people did not want an absolute monarchy. This is because people thought it was necessary for them.







I hope this helped!!!!!!!!!!! Please mark me as Brainiest</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an important result of Prohibition during the 1920s?
Dmitriy789 [7]

The correct answer is A) Respect for the law decreased.

The outlawing of alcohol was supposed to result in America having less crime and violence. However, the actual effect was almost the direct opposite. For example, during this era millions of Americans continued to drink alcohol illegal. Many citizens lost respect for the law and continued to drink alcohol illegally thanks to the development of speakeasies (underground bars that served alcohol).

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match each model with its name and the name of the scientist who created it.
    9·2 answers
  • Why did Henry the 8th create his own church in England? what was the act of supremacy who was Thomas more and what happened to h
    5·1 answer
  • How did hamilton win the supoport of the south?
    12·2 answers
  • Does Congress have the power to oversee currency or bankruptcy?
    5·1 answer
  • Which best describes military strategy during World War I?​
    10·1 answer
  • How did the Presidency of Richard Nixon lead to a decrease of public trust in government?
    5·1 answer
  • Connect East Africa’s geographic proximity to the Indian Ocean to its historic development. How might the region have developed
    15·1 answer
  • _______ A noted anti-Federalist, he wrote about the Constitution that "There is no Declaration of Rights."
    11·1 answer
  • 19) Which of the following choices describes the court case Plessy v. Ferguson? (select two answers). Incorrect answers will be
    14·1 answer
  • How did the New England and middle colonies help the southern colonies?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!