Answer:
Tsar Nicholas II's abdication came against a backdrop of a changing political, social and religious nation but the catalyst for change came through Russia's struggles in the First World War. Nicholas was chosen to rule by his family rite.
Explanation:
Answer:
no he wasnt
Sure he removes the Royalty and all, but he never manages to do better in the ruling. He was power crazy, he kill those who disagree with him and use people to maintain his power, and all his promise for prosperity never achieved in his lives. Heck, he actually loses his first election and calls it void. He was a tyrannical ruler that are only slightly better than the old royalty, and better than Stalin who came after him.
He is not exactly the best example of a hero is. He is more of an idealist, and not cut out as a ruler, and he should never have come into power. Maybe as revolutioner, he is good and all but the person who should come into power should have been someone else.
The constitution convention was held so as to be able to discuss about how to govern America.
<h3>What is
constitution convention?</h3>
The Constitutional Convention was organized to come into conclusion about the governing of America.
This convention took place on May 1787, and it took place in Pennsylvania and revision of the existing Articles of Confederation was done.
Learn more about constitution convention at:
brainly.com/question/14018105
#SPJ1
Answer:
They left many workers in debt to their employers.
Explanation:
The mill villages were something that was found very remarkable during the 19th century industrial development in the area known as the Blackstone River Valley. The very first textile mill was successfully built in 1793 by Samuel Slater and he later employed over thirty staff and they were mostly children.
Company villages were built by mill owners who wanted to use that as a philanthropic means to earn the loyalty of their workers. The company established stores and other small businesses like Barber shops. These businesses were easily assessed by workers living in those villages but that also made the millhands to remain in debt to their employers.
