The author credited with launching the English romantic movement was?

History

2 answers:

slega [8]3 years ago

8 0

The most likely answer you're looking for: William Wordsworth.

Depending on who/what was covered in your classroom, it's also possible that Samuel Taylor Coleridge could be mentioned together with Wordsworth as the early leaders of the Romantic movement in England. The two of them together are often credited with launching the English Romantic movement. Wordsworth and Coleridge were friends and sometimes collaborators. Interesting Literature (a site based in England), has listed their picks for "10 of the Best Poems by English Romantic Poets," and the top 4 on their list are by Wordsworth and Coleridge:

1. My Heart Leaps Up (by Wordsworth)

2. I Wandered Lonely as a Cloud (by Wordsworth)

3. Frost at Midnight (by Coleridge)

4. The Rime of the Ancient Mariner (by Coleridge)

Firlakuza [10]3 years ago

6 0

It was William Blake who is commonly credited with launching the English romantic movement was, although his greatly went largely unrecognized during his lifetime unfortunately.

You might be interested in

What were two arguments for and two arguments against annexation of the Philippines? Which side do you agree with and why?

vovikov84 [41]

Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.

5 0

2 years ago

Why was the postwar situation in germany especially bad

ioda

If you're talking about WWI then their military was restricted heavily, they had war reparations, and all of this was topped off with out of control debt and inflation. Essentially, everyone was mad and poor.

3 0

3 years ago

Era of good feeling was characterized by a renewed sence of?

kari74 [83]

The Era of Good Feelings marked a period in the political history of the United States that reflected a sense of national purpose and a desire for unity among Americans in the aftermath of the War of 1812.

3 0

3 years ago

What effect would you expect the 1964 Supreme Court case, Wesberry v. Sanders, to have on the likelihood of a group of small rur

Anna007 [38]

Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population.

Nationally, this decision effectively reduced the representation of rural districts in the U.S. Congress. Particularly, the Court held that the population differences among Georgia's congressional districts were so great as to violate the Constitution.

In reaching this landmark decision, the Supreme Court asserted that Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitutionrequires that representatives shall be chosen "by the People of the several States" and shall be "apportioned among the several States...according to their respective Numbers...." These words, the Court held, mean that "as nearly as practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's."

Wesberry and the Court's later "one person, one vote" decisions had an extraordinary impact on the makeup of the House, on the content of public policy, and on electoral politics in general. However, these "one person, one vote" rules do not prevent and have not prevented gerrymandering.

A related case, Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), held that seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislaturemust also, to satisfy the Equal Protection Clause, represent districts as equal in population as practicably possible. The federal Senate was unaffected since the Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators.

4 0

4 years ago

How did the Nazi party enforce the Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring?

12345 [234]

Answer:

Explanation:

Law for the Prevention of Genetically Diseased Offspring or "Sterilisation Law" was a statute in Nazi Germany enacted on July 14, 1933, which allowed the compulsory sterilisation of any citizen who in the opinion of a "Genetic Health Court" suffered from a list of alleged genetic disorders – many of which were not, in fact, genetic. The elaborate interpretive commentary on the law was written by three dominant figures in the racial hygiene movement: Ernst Rüdin, Arthur Gütt and the lawyer Falk Ruttke. The law itself was based on the American Model Eugenical Sterilization Law developed by Harry H. Laughlin.

5 0

3 years ago