This is an example or description of "a<span>rgument against the person, abusive".</span>
It is a wrong
argumentative methodology whereby original discourse of the current subject is dodged
by rather assaulting the character, intention, or other quality of the
individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, as
opposed to countering the substance of the contention itself. Usually known as “Ad
hominem”.
Okay, this just goes back to the civil war. one difference between the northern and southern was the idea of slavery.
Block access to sidewalks or buildings. March in the streets without a permit. Disrupt counter-protests. Engage in speech that is obscene, makes knowingly false statements of fact, or that is likely to incite an immigration disruptive or dangerous disturbance
Hope you found this helpful, not to sure what your asking, i mainly come here after long days to rant about different things to i don’t know if your understanding what i just wrote!
Anyways have a lovely day sir.boo
Discord: sw4gee#8235 (lol im lonley)
Answer:
yes, but the buyer will have to undergo the complete buyer qualification process
Explanation:
The buyer can be absolutely assumed to the mortgage of the seller. But there is a condition that the buyer has to complete and qualify the buyer qualification process.
<u>Buyer qualification process:-</u>
The qualifying process is done in order to sort out the needs of the buyer from the wants and also relate the buying power of the buyer to available housing stock.
Thus, it measure the capability of the buyer so to purchase a property,
