Assuming you're talking about the US justice system . . . individuals still have rights when they are accused of criminal acts because our justice system requires that each individual be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Until such point that they are proven guilty, they are assumed innocent, and are entitled to the same rights as you or I am, having not committed any criminal acts. . . . THEY HAVE TO BE PROVEN GUILTY FIRST BEFORE THEY LOSE ANY RIGHTS AS A CITIZEN
Answer:
firm must borrow $288000 to achieve the target debt ratio
Explanation:
given data
assets = $720,000
debt to total capital ratio = 40%
to find out
How much must the firm borrow to achieve the target debt ratio
solution
we get here debt here by Debt to Total capital ratio that is express as
Debt to Total capital ratio = Debt ÷ ( Debt + Equity ) ....................1
put here value we get debt
0.40 = 
debt = $288000
so firm must borrow $288000 to achieve the target debt ratio
ZERO amount would the insurance company pay for vandalism that does $425 of damage to a home if the insured homeowner has a $500 deductible.
( Because the deductible exceeds the loss or the damage. The loss is $425 and the deductible is $ 500, so here the deductible exceeds the loss hence the insurance company will not pay anything).
People like you pay premiums to insurance companies to cover potential losses related to their property. Insurance companies receive these premiums and aggregate them into money pools. These funds are available to cover losses incurred by pool members.
When you report a car accident to the insurance company, the insurance company will send an adjuster to assess the damage. The expert's first task is to decide whether to classify the vehicle as a total loss. Assuming the vehicle is a total loss, the expert performs a valuation and assigns a value to the vehicle.
Learn more about vandalism at
brainly.com/question/13646632
#SPJ4
Answer:
Check the following explanation.
Explanation:
The goals of managers and shareholders are not always aligned. Agency theory suggests this misalignment creates the need for costly monitoring through compensation contracts.
To align the goals of the two parties,compensation contracts should be designed to motivate the executive to make decisions that will not only increase his or her wealth, but will also increase shareholder wealth. Steps taken to increase shareholder wealth should be reflected in improved firm performance.Including both components in the contracts helps ensure the decisions of the executive are linked to various time horizons.
Shortterm components motivate the executive to make decisions that have an immediate affect on the firm. Long-term components are necessary to lengthen the decision horizon of the executive and enhance the likelihood of continued improvement in firm value. The long-term incentives in these contracts can be based on improved shareholder wealth as well as improved firm performance.
