3 years ago

Law experts believe that the best way for judges to use judicial restraint is to

Social Studies

2 answers:

Grace [21]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

D) make small rulings that pertain to specific cases

Explanation:

The judicial restraint is basically the power of the judges to delcare a ruling or a bill unconstitutional, this is basically the power of judges to stop a rulin or a law, but law experts believe that the best way to enforce this power is to do it with small rulings that are done to specific cases.

yan [13]3 years ago

3 0

D. Make small rulings that pertain to specific cases

You might be interested in

What<br>are the<br>sources of national identity in the<br>context of Nepal

nexus9112 [7]

Explanation:

In this context the muluki ain of 1854 stratified the Nepalese society according to a Hindu caste system, which was a little bit different from that ...

3 0

3 years ago

How will you use your learnings in English for Academic Purposes in taking part on solving problems related to pandemic?

Pani-rosa [81]

ekn-ouhw-qek

jóin ón góógle mèèt fór yóûr àñswèr

3 0

2 years ago

I was the MVP of Super Bowl XLI. I attended the University of Tennessee and play the position of quarterback. Who am I?

Colt1911 [192]

Peyton Manning is the answer

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What right does Amendment IV protect?

Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Amendment IV protects citizens from law enforcement offenders searches. Officers must have a search warrant in order to search a person’s property

7 0

3 years ago

Should our country get involved in the affairs of other countries? Explain your answer using examples

ycow [4]

I feel like it would depend.

If the U.S weren’t involved in foreign affairs, the U.S wouldn’t be easily blamed for something.
We would be considered “innocent” in a way to the worlds eyes
Which is a good profile for a place to have

So, if it were to create a profit for the U.S then I believe we should not get involved in other countries affairs

8 0

3 years ago