Answer: 4. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Explanation:
In June 1978, the Supreme Court declared that affirmative action was legal insofar as racial quotas were not used. The case was brought by a white California man, Allan Bakke who said he had suffered reverse racism as he had higher scores than minority group members but was refused admission because of a University rule that reserved 16% of admission slots for minority groups. The Supreme Court ordered the University to admit Bakkie as using quotas was unconstitutional but also held that race can be used as a valid factor in admissions decisions.
This showed that affirmative action was legal but subject to scrutiny.
As trade intensified between Africa and Asia, prosperous city-states flourished along the eastern coast of Africa.
Answer:
Retribution
Explanation:
Retribution is the act of taking revenge. It is harming someone in pay back for something harmful that they have done. The mother of the murdered child want some form of revenge because she believes her child was killed by someone who can never have remorse for what was done to her child . She feels retribution is the best form of punishment for what wasndonr to her child.
Its a i think could be wrong tho good luck
Answer:
b. All charitable organizations qualify for a charitable contribution deduction.
Explanation:
It is false that all charitable organizations qualify for a charitable contribution deduction. You may be able to deduct a charitable contribution as long as this was made to a charity that is qualified under section 170(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, it is important that you check whether a charity belongs to this category before attempting to claim a tax deduction.
