1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
puteri [66]
3 years ago
11

Use the ratio table to solve the percent problem.

Mathematics
2 answers:
patriot [66]3 years ago
7 0
1. Would be 60% like how 1/100 equals 1%

2. Excel conditional formatting is a really powerful feature when it comes to applying different formats to data that meets certain conditions. It can help you highlight the most important information in your spreadsheets and identify variances of cells' values with a quick glance.
Leto [7]3 years ago
7 0
That's easy 60%<span> percent </span>
You might be interested in
Can someone help me with this question please?
Simora [160]

Answer:

35

Each sequence has a difference of eight numbers so we add 8 numbers in each sequence

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
GIVING BRAINLIEST! PLS SHOW WORK!!
julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

30

Step-by-step explanation:

all traiangles have to same vetec

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Order these from least to greatest -[4], [-4], [2], [-8]
iren [92.7K]
-[4]   [2]    [-4]    [-8]
mark me brainliest if i right ty :))
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n &gt; 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
The sum of three consecutive multiples of 7 is 168 find the numbers
andrey2020 [161]

the three numbers are 49,56 and 63.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nisha and Marcie Drive 20 miles from sisters to hoodoo to go skiing. The speed limit is 75 555 miles per hour. It snowed all nig
    15·1 answer
  • Mary has 13 spools of rope. Each spool holds between 36 and 45 meters of rope. Which could be the total number of meters of rope
    7·1 answer
  • Francois baked just enough cookies to fill all the orders at his bakery. While the cookies were cooling, a kitchen assistant kno
    5·1 answer
  • 10. Find the distance between A(-2, 1) and B(4, -3). Round your answer to<br> the nearest TENTH
    7·1 answer
  • (Photo)
    7·2 answers
  • What is the area of this Trapezoid?
    13·2 answers
  • Rewrite the rational exponent as a radical
    5·1 answer
  • This is for my lil sister
    14·1 answer
  • Express in the form n : 1.<br> Give n as a fully simplified fraction.<br> 20 : 15
    11·2 answers
  • I need help please as soon as possible thanks
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!