1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ad libitum [116K]
3 years ago
8

What actions were taken as "clear indicators" of U.S. post war position? (Nokilov Telegram)

History
1 answer:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

<em>Hello There Again. The correct answer C. Limiting Soviet influence in neighboring countries.</em>

Explanation:

Because of The Russian  Russia had ever

known before. This achievement and its ensuing results led to the emergence

of the Soviet Union as a military superpower. In this capacity, the Soviet

Union was able to project its power to a degree unparalleled in Russian

history-a transformation with immense potential. This broad view focused

the examination of the symposium’s various topics and themes, orally in

presentations and discussions, and then more fully in the essays of this

volume, composed prior to the symposium and refiied in its wake.

All historical records are incomplete and these proceedings are an

imperfect record. The introductions and commentaries exhibit some discontinuities because their authors did not see the revised versions of the papers

contained in this volume. The members of the inti~~ti~nal panelwhich

closed the symposium commented only briefly because of time limitations,

but subsequently submitted the written observations in this volume. Discussions with the audience at the symposium’s sessions and the banquet presentation by Brig. Gen. Roland Lajoie, USA, on “The Soviet Fignting Man” are

not included here because of space limitations. They must remain the special

pleasure, benefit, and memory of the symposium’s participants.

What distinguishes this book from others in Soviet studies and Russian

military history? In Soviet studies a plethora of books and articles on military issues exists in a contemporary framework from the vantage points of

national security and international relations. Very few are written in the historical perspective. In Western writing on Russian military history, the

number of historians and uniformed specialists recognized as truly outstanding is surprisingly limited- fact which became forcefully evident to

the symposium’s organizers as they combed Germany, France, Great Britain,

and the United Stam for qualified contributors. This volume views the subject historically and may be unique in its combination of overall program,

individual connibutions, and suggestions for future research. In the structure

of its program it is a survey of modern Russian military history. In its individual contributions it provides a good bit of specialized “post-holing.” It

possesses a pragmatic, professional military view in having sought out contributions by qualified military contributors and in providing a bibliographical aid. This aid is a significant indicator of the current professional

level of Soviet military studies in the West, offering military specialists,

scholars, and graduate students a readily accessible tool for further research

and study. The Great Patriotic War demonstrated both capabilities and deficiencies

in Soviet society, many still unexplored by Western specialists. The ability

of the Soviet Union to sustain itself in the face of extraordmxy losses and

destruction is indisputable. Why this was true is less cIear. It may be that

this was the major contribution of the Communist Party, but the issue remains

unestablished, at least in Western minds. This question is related to one of

the symposium’s major gaps, the question of the role of the “rear” or the

“homefront” in Russian wars and in particular in World War II. The poverty

of Westem scholarship on the Russian and Soviet ‘‘mar’’ caused planners for

the Academy’s 1982 military history symposium to leave out Russia and the

Soviet Union altogether at that symposium, which was devoted to the subject. Hope it helps!

You might be interested in
Ill give brainliest
mars1129 [50]

The women's rights movement was the offspring of abolition. Many people actively supported both reforms. How did these two movements develop and how were they related to each other? How did each develop strategies and deal with the contradiction of violence and war that results from the advocacy of peaceful change? "...the flagrant injustice and deep sin of slavery" After the American Revolution, northern states began to abolish slavery. Many slaveholders in the upper South also freed slaves. In 1817, the American Colonization Society formed to resettle freed slaves in Africa. However, the South depended on slave labor as cotton production expanded after the 1793 invention of the cotton gin. Repressive laws and public justification of slavery followed southern slave revolts in the 1820s and 1830s. Religious revivals during the Second Great Awakening intensified anti-slavery activity after 1830. Seeking to perfect society, adherents targeted slavery as an evil that destroyed individual free will as moral beings. Abolitionists began to demand immediate, uncompensated emancipation of slaves. In 1833, William Lloyd Garrison, editor of The Liberator, Quaker Lucretia Mott, and several others formed the American Anti-Slavery Society. Women were a large part of the general membership and formed separate, local female anti-slavery branches. Mott also helped found the Philadelphia Female Anti-Slavery Society in 1833, an organization, noted for its promotion of racial and gender equality, that included African American and white women as leaders and members. Many anti-slavery reformers, like the Quakers, came from pacifist backgrounds or espoused nonviolent social reform. They shaped public opinion by distributing newspapers and tracts, sending out organizers and lecturers, and hosting fundraising fairs. Garrison, who saw the U.S. Constitution and federal government as pro-slavery forces, observed Independence Day as a day of mourning. Lucretia Mott and Thomas M'Clintock helped form the Philadelphia Free Produce Society, which boycotted slave-made products. Between 1838 and 1840, the American Anti-Slavery Society split in three, in part over the issue of women's leadership, specifically Abby Kelley's appointment to the business committee. Radical abolitionists and women's rights supporters, known as "Garrisonian" abolitionists, remained in the American Anti-Slavery Society. The newly formed American and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society restricted membership to males, with auxiliaries for females. The politically minded formed the Liberty Party, limiting women's participation to fundraising. The discrimination of women in abolition and other reform movements led them to advocate for women's rights. "Justice and Equality:" Antislavery and Women's Rights "…this is the only organization on God's footstool where the humanity of woman is recognized, and these are the only men who have ever echoed back her cries for justice and equality…. All time will not be long enough to pay the debt of gratitude we owe these noble men…who roused us to a sense of our own rights, to the dignity of our high calling." Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Address to the American Anti-Slavery Society, 1860.At the 1848 First Women's Rights Convention, the Declaration of Sentiments, drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Elizabeth and Mary Ann M'Clintock, was read and signed by 100 men and women. Claiming that "all Men and Women are created equal," the signers called for extending to women the right to vote, control property, sign legal documents, serve on juries, and enjoy equal access to education and the professions. Arguments for women's rights came from experiences in the anti-slavery movement. Angelina and Sarah Grimké of South Carolina were Quakers and effective anti-slavery speakers, although it was considered improper for women to speak before "promiscuous" audiences composed of both men and women. During a petition drive in Massachusetts in 1837, male listeners thronged to female-only lectures. While condemning slavery, the Grimkés upheld "the cause of woman as a moral being." "Sister Sarah does preach up woman's rights most nobly and fearlessly," reported Angelina to a friend. Rebuked by Congregational ministers and others for speaking to promiscuous audiences, they held their ground. To do otherwise would have been As reformers, women developed organizational skills necessary for successful social movement. They learned to write persuasively, raise funds, organize supporters and events, and speak to large groups of men and women about important political and social issues. In the service of anti-slavery, women found their voices. Between 1850 and 1860, women's rights advocates held state and national conventions and campaigned for legal changes. I hope this helps! <3

3 0
3 years ago
What was the most important reason why Kansas City, Minneapolis, and Chicago grew so<br> quickly?
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

(See explanation for further details)

Explanation:

Since those cities were communication nodes that eased the expansion of the United States of America to the west, where railway, finnancial and mail services were developed very rapidly and at a gigantic scale, requiring great numbers of workforce.

5 0
3 years ago
What was one way that slavery in Africa differed from the institution of slavery in Europe or the United States?
OleMash [197]
One way that differed was that Africans were often sold by other Africans.
I hope this helps
6 0
3 years ago
What kind of state should be referred to as a " republic" according to Rousseau? Why?
IRINA_888 [86]
The state that is governed by laws because the laws are the conditions of civil association
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which resources, when used and developed, triggered the tremendous industrial growth known as the Second Industrial Revolution?
Ainat [17]

Answer: Petroleum, Electricity and Steel

Explanation: The second industrial revolution is a period between the late 19th to the early 20th century which is characterized by massive growth and expansion of industrialization. The second industrial revolution is also known as the technological revolution most notable for steel production, expansion in electrification which was previously limited to very few cities and development of Petroleum and gas supply.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What beliefs are shared by nearly all Muslims
    15·2 answers
  • The first labor union in the United States was the
    6·2 answers
  • Who benefited most from the policies enacted by Reagan administration
    7·2 answers
  • Democrats who were adamantly opposed to the Civil War were called _____.
    11·1 answer
  • What role did the rise of capitalism play in the Renaissance
    6·1 answer
  • 1. What is Newton's universal law of gravitation?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following obstacles would western settlers have NOT encountered on the waterways
    5·1 answer
  • I need help with this.<br> If you get it right you will get<br> Brilliant, 5 stars, and thank you
    13·1 answer
  • If u answer all of these u will get brainiest and 80 points
    10·2 answers
  • Why did the greeks expand from their own city-states?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!