Answer:
c
Explanation:
because I looked it up it was pretty easy
Answer:
3. Freedom of speech
Explanation:
In the case of Schenck v. United States (1919) concerned protest activities against American involvement in World War I. Justice Oliver Holmes, Jr. said that trying to convince draft-age men to resist induction was intended to result in a crime, and posed a "clear and present danger" of succeeding. The Supreme Court decision in the case related to a freedom of speech. In the case of Schenck v. United States (1919), it was mentioned that speech which creates clear and present danger is not protected under the first amendment. In this case Supreme court highlighted that the power of the federal government over an individual's right to freedom of speech.
Answer and explanation:
In predicting an adult woman's behavior, it may be more important to know that she is the mother of a 3-year-old child than to know whether she is 20 or 30 years old. This reflects the concept of <u>maturing. </u>
In order to give psychological details about a person and a specific situation that said person is going through, there are many factors that must be taken into account. Many times,, the way someone handles a certain problem or circumstance does not have much to do with their age but with their level of maturity.
The supreme court held the drug testing by school authorities reasonable under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. So option d aptly describes the Vernonia v Acton cases.
<h3>What is the Vernonia v Acton case?</h3>
The Supreme Court of the U.S. in June 1995 gave a verdict that the random drug-testing by the Oregon school authority of student-athletes is valid under the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment.
The ruling under the Vernonia v Acton cases showed Students enjoy fewer Fourth Amendment protections than free adults i.e students are under strict government control than adults.
Therefore option d aptly describes the Vernonia v Acton cases ruling
Learn more about Vernonia v Acton cases here:
brainly.com/question/19604059