Http://www.globaltrade.net/f/business/text/Mexico/Trade-Policy-Trade-Barriers-in-Mexico.html hope this helps
Impeachment is the process in which the law makers can charge any high ranking officials for alleged crimes committed during their term of serving in office.
Explanation:
A Government Official cannot be instantly removed merely on the basis of accusations and suspicion. Impeachable offences include treason, bribery and bad conduct. Any member of the house of Representative can introduce the impeachment resolution. The House decided whether or not to send the recommendation of the alleged crime to the Judiciary committee or not.,Then it is sent for the approval of the judicial committee. It analyses the accusations and writes and analyses the impeachment as per the constitutional mandates. Again it is sent back to the house of representatives which debates and deliberates.
If forty one members agrees the validity of the accusation then, the recommendations on the impeachment charges are sent to the senate, the senate leader can either decline or take steps against the allegations by putting it for vote. if two third that is 67 members of the senate out of hundred approve in favor of conviction, then the official is removed.
Hence the three ways to stay in office even after inquiry is house of representatives, Judiciary committee and Senate have to deliberate on the accusations only then impeachment goes to the next level of removal from the accused candidate from the office.
Answer:
Luisa finds and corrects an error in ___punctuation_______.
Explanation:
a) The paragraph omitted a comma punctuation mark after the word "campfire." When Luisa puts this comma after "campfire," the sentence becomes grammatically correct.
So the error that Luisa finds and corrects in the passage is the omission of comma punctuation. A comma punctuation mark gives a short break in a sentence. Full stop gives a long break.
Answer:
Yes, democratic society is based around some kind of vote from the people.
Explanation:
Answer:
If George is an utilitarian thinker he should focus on what the possible outcomes of the situation might be if it turns out the player wasn't cheating.
Explanation:
Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that determines right from wrong by focusing on outcomes. This theory says that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
However, since we cannot predict the future, it is difficult to be certain of what the consequences of our actions will be.
In the example, if George is an utilitarian thinker, he will focus on outcomes. It <u>appeared to him that the other player took a card from his lap and switched it with a card that he was dealt,</u> however, <u>he cannot be sure</u> if the player is indeed cheating.
As an utilitarian thinker, George should focus on what the possible outcomes of the situation might be if it turns out the player wasn't cheating.
