Answer: the area of the shaded region is 72.96 ft²
Step-by-step explanation:
The formula for determining the area of a circle is expressed as
Area = πr²
Where
r represents the radius of the circle.
π is a constant whose value is 3.14
From the information given,
Diameter of circle = 16 feet
Radius = diameter/2 = 16/2 = 8 feet
Area of circle = 3.14 × 8² = 200.96ft²
The sides of the square are equal. To determine the length of each side of the square, L, we would apply Pythagoras theorem which is expressed as
Hypotenuse² = opposite side² + adjacent side²
Therefore,
16² = L² + L²
256 = 2L²
L² = 256/2 = 128
L = √128 ft
Area of the square is
L² = (√128)²
Area = 128 ft²
Area of shaded region is
200.96 - 128 = 72.96 ft²
Answer:
2,4,8,16,32,64
Step-by-step explanation:
There are a couple of ways one could approach this. The goal is to find out the factor by which the numbers are increasing. Looking at going from 8 -> 16, we have either added 8, or doubled 8. So the factor is either +8 or x2. Going from 16 -> 32, adding 8 no longer holds true, while multiplying by 2 (doubling 16) does. To confirm what we have found, we can further check our math by using the final two numbers, 32 -> 64, to confirm that the sequence pattern is to double the current number to achieve the next number.
Working backwards, we can half each number to find out the first two numbers in the sequence. 64/2 = 32, 32/2 = 16, 16/2 = 8, 8/2 = 4, 4/2 = 2
Answer:
And we can calculate the p value with the following probability taking in count the alternative hypothesis:
And for this case using a significance level of 
we see that the p value is larger than the significance level so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is less than 0.02
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we want to test the following system of hypothesis:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
The statistic for this case is given by:
(1)
And for this case we know that the statistic is given by:
And we can calculate the p value with the following probability taking in count the alternative hypothesis:
And for this case using a significance level of we see that the p value is larger than the significance level so then we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis and we don't have enough evidence to conclude that the true proportion is less than 0.02
If you look at the sequence, you would observe:
5 - 2 = 3, 8 - 5 = 3, 11 - 8 = 3.
There is a common difference of 3, so the sequence is an Arithmetic Progression.
nth term of an AP = a + (n - 1)d
where a = 1st term = 2, d = common difference = 3
nth term of an AP = a + (n - 1)d
nth term of an AP = 2 + (n - 1)*3 = 2 + 3*n - 3*1 = 2 + 3n - 3
= 2 - 3 + 3n
= -1 + 3n
= 3n - 1
The nth term = 3n - 1, where n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,....
I hope this explains it.
