What could they add to their argument against slavery that would make their argument stronger or more convincing?

History

1 answer:

nydimaria [60]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

If I were to add something that would make my argument against slavery more convincing I would probably say something like what is the roles were switched, would you want to be a slave?

When people went to Africa or when they bought slaves they would often say something like it was in the bible and because of this that it was okay when this was not true so you could possibly use that to help your argument against it. There are probably better answers out there but I wrote a argument against slavery once and I used this stuff in and got a pretty good grade.

You might be interested in

What were the four trends that pushed europe toward war in the late 1800s and early 1900s?

maks197457 [2]

The four trends that pushed Europe toward war in the late 1800s and early 1900s were:
1- The alliance system

2- Militarism: which means that either the government or the people or both desired to keep a very strong military capability. This military capability was then used aggressively to spread the country's interest and promote them.

3- Nationalism: which means that there was a group of different systems (political, economic and social) working on promoting interests of a particular nation in order to gain self-governance, or full sovereignty, over the group's homeland.

4- Imperialism: which means that the country actually expanded its power by the acquisition of territories

3 0

3 years ago

The end of the cattle boom ________________ a. had nothing to do with climate changes. b. was the result of increased competitio

amm1812

Answer:

b. was the result of increased competition for open range.

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

When was the Indian removal act of 1830 created by Congress ?

leva [86]

Answer:

May 28, 1830

Explanation:

Plz and thank you mark brainliest

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

To which side of the immigration debate does the following argument apply? The United States has an obligation to help relatives

Katyanochek1 [597]

The correct answer is Open Boarders

Explanation:

In a debate, there are two or more positions about a specific situation or issue. Additionally, each of these positions is supported by participants using arguments that can include facts, statistics, citations, among others. In the case of the immigration debate, one of the sides or positions is that immigrants should not be restricted from entering the country and therefore immigration should be considered as negative. Supporters of this side propose migration can help the economy of the country, promotes inequality, and can reunite families. Therefore, the opinion the government should promote family reunification as part of immigration is part of the Open Borders side that promotes reducing or ending for immigrants.

4 0

3 years ago

In what way did Carrie Chapman Catt contribute to social reform in this era? She wrote the Women’s Suffrage Amendment. She found

seropon [69]

She developed a new strategy to pursue women's voting rights

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers