What could they add to their argument against slavery that would make their argument stronger or more convincing?

History

1 answer:

nydimaria [60]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

If I were to add something that would make my argument against slavery more convincing I would probably say something like what is the roles were switched, would you want to be a slave?

When people went to Africa or when they bought slaves they would often say something like it was in the bible and because of this that it was okay when this was not true so you could possibly use that to help your argument against it. There are probably better answers out there but I wrote a argument against slavery once and I used this stuff in and got a pretty good grade.

You might be interested in

Was the Cuba unified or divided about these issues prior to the Spanish American War in April 1898?

Bezzdna [24]

The Cuba unified the issues during the Spanish American war in April 1898

5 0

3 years ago

why are the decisions in miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and mapp v. Ohio stilwhyl very important to defendants in cri

Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The decisions in Miranda v. Arizona, Gideon v. Wainwright, and Mapp v. Ohio are very important to defendants in criminal proceedings today because they enlarged defendants' rights in criminal trials and investigations.

Thus, Miranda v. Arizona refers to the fact that those accused of a crime must know their rights prior to being questioned by the police, that is, that everything they say can be used against them and that they have the right to consult a lawyer.

For its part, Gideon v. Wainwright guaranteed the defendants the right to have a lawyer, even when they could not afford it on their own financial means. In this way, a defendant is not left legally unprotected for not being able to afford a lawyer, since it is the state that grants him one for free.

Finally, Mapp v. Ohio prohibits the use of illegitimately obtained evidence in criminal proceedings. Thus, non-compliance with the Fourth Amendment (and the consequent search without a warrant) renders the evidence obtained in this way not admissible in court.

8 0

3 years ago

What are unalienable rights? a Rights that belong to citizens of voting age only. b Rights that belong to citizens only and can

finlep [7]

Answer:

D. Basic rights that belong to all people and cannot be taken away.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Summary about the Samurai and the way of the warriors In your own words.

miv72 [106K]

Answer:

As a member of the Fujiwara Clan i can say that the Samurai were amazing worrier's and they commanded respect. The training they went through was tough, rigorous, and challenging. The samurai were some of the if not the most honorable worrier's to ever walk the Earth.

Explanation:

The Fujiwara dominated the Japanese politics of Heian period (794–1185) through the monopoly of regent positions, sesshō and kampaku. The family's primary strategy for central influence was through the marrying of Fujiwara daughters to emperors they were also powerful regents in Japan.

7 0

3 years ago

The Mongols in China and the Mughals in India were similar in that

nikklg [1K]

"Coming to the spoken language, the Mughals spoke Chagatai Turkic language, which is not of the same family which Mongolian language belongs to. With respect to descent, the first Mughal emperor, Babur, claimed direct descent from Genghis Khan, a Mongol and Timur, a Turk."
- Google

7 0

3 years ago