1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
docker41 [41]
3 years ago
12

Effects of the Cuban Revolution on the Caribbean

History
1 answer:
Komok [63]3 years ago
3 0

Impact of the Cuban Revolution

By most social and economic indicators, Cuba by mid-century was among Latin America’s most highly developed countries. However, in the postwar period it was afflicted with lacklustre economic growth and a corrupt political dictatorship set up in 1952 by the same Batista who earlier had helped put his country on a seemingly democratic path. It was also a country whose long history of economic and other dependence on the United States had fed nationalist resentment, although control of the sugar industry and other economic sectors by U.S. interests was gradually declining. While conditions for revolutionary change were thus present, the particular direction that Cuba took owed much to the idiosyncratic genius of Fidel Castro, who, after ousting Batista at the beginning of 1959, proceeded by stages to turn the island into the hemisphere’s first communist state, in close alliance with the Soviet Union.

The Cuban Revolution achieved major advances in health and education, though frankly sacrificing economic efficiency to social objectives. Expropriation of most private enterprise together with Castro’s highly personalistic dictatorship drove many members of the middle and upper classes into exile, but a serious decline in productivity was offset for a time by Soviet subsidies. At the same time, thanks to its successful defiance of the United States—which tried and failed to overthrow it by backing a Cuban exiles’ invasion in April 1961—and its evident social advances, Castro’s Cuba was looked to as a model throughout Latin America, not only by established leftist parties but also by disaffected students and intellectuals of mainly middle-class origin.

Over the following years much of Latin America saw an upsurge of rural guerrilla conflict and urban terrorism, in response to the persistence of stark social inequality and political repression. But this upsurge drew additional inspiration from the Cuban example, and in many cases Cuba provided training and material support to guerrillas. The response of Latin American establishments was twofold and eagerly supported by the United States. On one hand, governments strengthened their armed forces, with U.S. military aid preferentially geared to counterguerrilla operations. On the other hand, emphasis was placed on land reform and other measures designed to eliminate the root causes of insurgency, all generously aided by the United States through the Alliance for Progress launched by President John F. Kennedy.

Even though much of the reactive social reformism was cosmetic or superficial, the counterrevolutionary thrust was nonetheless generally successful. A Marxist, Salvador Allende, became president of Chile in 1970, but he did so by democratic election, not violent revolution, and he was overthrown three years later. The only country that appeared to be following the Cuban pattern was Nicaragua under the Sandinista revolutionary government, which in the end could not withstand the onslaughts of its domestic and foreign foes. Moreover, the Cuban Revolution ultimately lost much of its lustre even in the eyes of the Latin American left, once the collapse of the Soviet Union caused Cuba to lose its chief foreign ally. Although the U.S. trade embargo imposed on Cuba had been a handicap all along, shortages of all kinds became acute only as Russian aid was cut back, clearly revealing the dysfunctional nature of Castro’s economic management.

Political alternatives

Movement toward democracy

The Latin American countries that did not opt for the Cuban model followed widely varying political paths. Mexico’s unique system of limited democracy built around the Institutional Revolutionary Party was shaken by a wave of riots in the summer of 1968 on the eve of the Olympic Games held in Mexico City, but political stability was never seriously in doubt. A somewhat analogous regime was devised in Colombia as a means of restoring civilian constitutional rule after a brief relapse in the mid-1950s into military dictatorship: the dominant Liberal and Conservative parties chose to bury the hatchet, creating a bipartisan coalition (called the National Front) whereby they shared power equally between themselves while formally shutting out any minor parties. Once this arrangement expired in 1974, Colombia became again a more conventional political democracy, such as Costa Rica had been since before 1950 and Venezuela became in 1958 after the overthrow of its last military dictator.

 

 

 

 

 

You might be interested in
In the Middle Ages, Christians were expected to visit a priest yearly to offer
Aneli [31]

Answer:

Confessions

Explanation:

Christianity was was the only religion recognized in The Middle Ages. It dominated the the lives of both the peasants and the nobles. The Christianity that was spread across Europe during the middle ages was based on the scriptures that recounted the life of the Christ and his disciples The priests were part of life during the Middle Ages. They were people to trust enough to tell them the secrets and the private matters .They were exempt from tax because they provided spiritual care and conducted religious services to their parishioners. The opinion was that that Middle ages Christians was that the confessions were to be done to the priests.. I was that individual were to confess who were the Middle Age Christians had to   confess sins committed have them absolved by God through the administration of a Priest

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Patriotism is the last refuge to which a scoundrel clings is quoted by
Bumek [7]
Samuel Johnson said that quote on April 7, 1775
4 0
3 years ago
How would you compare reactions to the townshend acts with reactions to the stamp act?
yawa3891 [41]
You can compare the reactions to the townshend acts with reactions to the stamp act since people decided protest for both acts. Townshend Acts<span> did not create an instant uproar like the </span>Stamp Act. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
7 0
3 years ago
A young man living in England during the early 17th century decides that he does not agree with some teachings of the Anglican C
Nonamiya [84]

Answer:

Anglicanism

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What was the importance of a cash economy?
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

people could now buy goods instead of just trade.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Write a 125-word paragraph in which you examine the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. How
    11·1 answer
  • Why was the Battle of Gettysburg an important turning point in the war? The Union pushed the Southern armies back into Virginia.
    12·1 answer
  • Why is stability important for an empire?
    6·1 answer
  • When did Spain truce with dutch start ?
    5·2 answers
  • In the time of the ottoman empire what did the janissaries do
    6·1 answer
  • ______________________ is an organization in which people share costs and profits.
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Explain two consequences of the Potsdam conference, 1945. (8 marks)
    5·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me​
    13·1 answer
  • How does the Twenty-second Amendment protect individual rights?
    6·2 answers
  • Senaraikan sistem timbang dan sukat yang diperkenalkan sebelum british​
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!