He built a college in virginia and the helped with the architecture of capitol in virginia also he built monticello which is where he lived
Fall of Bastille, march to Versailles and flight to Varennes are the three major events which highlighted that the people were not ready to accept monarchy form of government.
Explanation:
Angry people marched to the Prison of Bastille which imprisoned the political prisoners. Many people attacked the prison and there was huge chaos on the streets because french men wanted to depose the despotic monarch King Louis XVI.
Many people were mostly unemployed and hungry and they started to march towards the palace of Queen Marie Antoinette who lived amidst of all luxuries and lent a deaf ear to the hardships of the civilians. National assembly was formed which had the overruling power against the King. These restrictions were disgusted by the king and they decide to take refuge in Austria which urged them to denounce revolution. All these incidents highlighted the power of monarch and the people were against the despotic french monarch.
The NCLB or the No Child Left Behind Act was put into law by President George W. Bush in January 8, 2002. This law is proposed in response to the ACCOUNTABILITY movement. With an immense bipartisan support, this law was passed and signed by the US President at that time.
A is the correct answer. They went in search of gold.
Replaced how? If you mean like the Roman empire, that would be incorrect. Both empires considered each other Roman and both empires considered themselves Roman. So when the west fell, the Byzantines did not 'replace' the western Romans in being Roman. Instead, they just kept on being Roman as their western counterparts fell. However, for a period, the Byzantines did manage to reconquer parts of the Western Empire and even Rome, but that was relatively short-lived. In that case, you could argue that the Byzantines sort of did replace the western Romans in being the Roman empire with Rome in its possession. However, that is a stretch in my opinion.
In short: False, the Eastern Romans did not replace the western Romans as they were both seen as Romans, just with different governments.
