The American Revolution was not a civil war because a “civil war” is typically between two groups within the same country. For instance, Parliament and the King fought each other in the English Civil War. Similar conflicts occurred between the Union and the Confederacy during the American Civil War.
Contrarily, the American Revolution was a conflict between a colonizer and a colony. Usually, these are not referred to as "civil wars," but rather as "rebellions," "revolts," or (to their supporters) "wars of liberation."
Any of these might constitute a "revolution," so long as it alters society, the economy, and culture fundamentally as well as the leadership. As you can expect, this makes the word "revolution" very political. The proponents of change refer to it as a "revolution," whilst the opponents use a less admirable term.
The Civil War would have been referred to as a "revolution" if the Confederacy had prevailed, and the Union may have even done so at some point. Instead, it fell short, and now we refer to the conflict of 1861–1865 as a civil war. It's just another instance of how the winners write history.
Answer:
Functional art is generally applied art - art created for use, designed to serve a purpose and with an aesthetic in mind. It's art that serves a function, but is also designed artistically for purpose of displaying beauty.
Go to www.online history degrees.com and you will find it
Answer: Not if it is a democratically elected government no matter how much the other country does not like it
Explanation:
1.EXPRESSED POWERS are those powers that are directly stated
in the constitution
2. IMPLIED POWERS are powers needed by the government to carry out expressed powers
3.INHERENT POWERSare powers needed by a national government because it is a government
