Answer:
Explanation:
1. What did the priest Johann Tetzel do that prompted Martin Luther to take action? ... Tetzel sold indulgences, promising buyers an assured entry into heaven.
What did Johann Tetzel do that made Martin Luther mad? A friar named Johann Tetzel was selling indulgences to raise money to rebuild St. ... Someone coped Luther's words and took them to a printer. Quickly, Luther's name became known all over Germany.
Hello,
Here is your answer:
I think the proper answer to this question will be option C or "Concurrent powers"! That's because D is the process of making a law. Its not A because that's what happen when the President doesn't agree with the law. When it came down to B or C I choose C because B judicial review is about trials and something to do with the jury.
Your answer is C!
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me.
Hope this helps!
This is also more properly known as deductive reasoning: taking all general premises and statements and working down to a conclusion that also holds to be true. If all the premises are true and logical rules are followed, the conclusion has to be true by necessity.
The US decided knew that germany had a greater naval militia so they decided to join forces with the brits.
Answer:
El adversario es visto como un enemigo al que hay que eliminar.
Explanation:
Claude Von Clausewitz fue un teórico militar alemán, conocido principalmente por sus participaciones defendiendo a Prusia en las Guerras Napoleónicas.
Clausewitz creía que las guerras eran solo otra forma de resolución de conflictos políticos, es decir, un instrumento legítimo de resolución de controversias (aunque obviamente, no el mas deseable por su costo en vidas y en dinero). Es decir, bajo su óptica la guerra era un medio por el cual se destruía al adversario político para lograr así los objetivos sin ninguna oposición.
Esta teoría plantea claramente a los conflictos políticos como una cuestión adversarial, donde el adversario es considerado un enemigo y, por lo tanto, necesariamente debe ser atacado y eliminado para concretar los objetivos propios. Es decir, Clausewitz no veía las divergencias políticas como enriquecedoras o constructivas, sino simplemente como cuestiones de conflicto y violencia.