1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dmitriy555 [2]
3 years ago
8

which text is valuable for gaining context about a history bit but is unreliable as evidence which text is valuable for gaining

context about a historical event but is unreliable as evidence
History
1 answer:
RSB [31]3 years ago
5 0

Hmm... your question is a bit too vague (since there were no options included) but I will answer it to the best of my ability... a secondary source is valuable for gaining context about history but is unreliable as evidence.

There are two sources I know of: primary sources and secondary sources.

A <em>primary source</em> is like a the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, etc. Primary sources don't have the the immediacy of the original thing.

A <em>secondary source</em> is like a textbook, as it was written to add to the primary source, and maybe biased.

<em>Other possible answers</em> to your question are: encyclopedia, anthology, historical fiction/history novel.

I hope that helps! :)

You might be interested in
Who led the Mormons west along the Mormon Trail in 1846?
Xelga [282]
Answer in ()
The Mormon Trail extends from Nauvoo, Illinois, which was the principal settlement of the Latter Day Saints from 1839 to 1846, to Salt Lake City, Utah, which was settled by (Brigham Young) and his followers beginning in 1847.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does judicial review ensure a balance of power in the United States?
horrorfan [7]

Answer:Judicial Review is the power of the U.S. Supreme Court to review laws and actions from Congress and the President to determine whether they are constitutional. This is part of the checks and balances that the three branches of the federal government use in order to limit each other and ensure a balance of power.

Hope this helps!-xoxo

Please give thanks or give brainly! <3

8 0
4 years ago
Spanish settlers began to settle the Texas froniter in what year?
adell [148]

Answer

The answer isn't an option, the real answer is 1680s

Explanation:

jfjf

3 0
3 years ago
If someone who worked 24 hours received $232 in pay, what is his or her hourly wage? 9.56
Serggg [28]
Hello there,

That person would earn $9.60 every hour.

My reason on this answer is. . 

I did 232 dollars ÷ 24 hours and got = $9.60 as his hourly wage.

Hope this helps

~Jurgen 
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise involve so much debate and discussion?
sesenic [268]

The great compromise and the three-fifth compromise involve so much debate and discussion because each state was looking out for its personal interest and needs.

The great compromise addresses the issues of representation  

The great compromise is also referred to as the Connecticut compromise, Sherman compromise or the great compromise of 1787. It’s an agreement that was made between small and large states as to the number of representatives that each state would have under the US constitution, including the legislature.

The agreement was made in 1787. This compromise was the outcome of the debate among the small and large state delegates as to the number of representatives that should come from each state. As a result of the heated debate, two-chamber congress was created.

The house of representatives was also created and its creation was determined by each states population. The great compromise agreement maintained the bicameral legislature. However, the senators to represent each state at the uppers were changed to two.  

The three-fifth compromise sought for more electoral power to the southern states.

At the 1787 constitutional convention, an agreement was reached by state delegates. This agreement is known as the three-fifth compromise. Based on the compromise, for the purpose of taxation and representation, American slaves would be counted as three-fifth of a person.

The three-fifth agreement gave more electoral power to southern states. However, this would not have been the case if the population of slaves were out rightly ignored.

LEARN MORE:

  • Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise brainly.com/question/5339742

KEYWORDS:

  • three-fifth compromise
  • the great compromise
  • delegates
  • american slaves
  • southern states
  • electoral power
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Charles Darwin believed that behaviors, such as emotional expressions associated with human rage, could be explained by natural
    8·1 answer
  • The goal of Hitler’s unsuccessful “Beer Hall Putsch” was to
    7·1 answer
  • The North was the most rural and agrarian of all the regions in the United States.
    11·1 answer
  • Who was Marco Polo? Explain how he inspired explorers like Columbus and Magellan. Whom did he serve when he was in
    6·2 answers
  • What three regions were involved in the triangular trade
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements BEST explains a cause of the Great Depression?
    14·1 answer
  • Please Please Help, It's timing me ​
    8·2 answers
  • Please help !!! Numbers 1-13 ALL PLEASE ILL GIVE THE BRAINIEST!!
    13·1 answer
  • Place the following events in sequence, from left to right: A) Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo; B) Battle of the Alamo; C) Texas bec
    12·1 answer
  • How did the mestizo de feel about the Spanish rulers
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!