All categories

3 years ago

The primary reason for the absence of much litigation under foreign competition law is:

Business

1 answer:

Leona [35]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

III only.

Cultural attitudes toward antitrust law differ.

Explanation:

Competition law is an area of law that seeks to maintain a level playing field for all participants in an industry by protecting them against anti-competitive conduct by companies.

For example two major players in an industry may collaborate to raise price of goods.

However in foreign competition law we have to consider that cultural attitudes towards antitrust law differs. What is accepted in one country may not apply in another. So there is absence of litigation when considering competition in the foreign scene.

You might be interested in

Which of the following is a true statement? A. Adverse selection occurs after a transaction has taken place in insurance market

Salsk061 [2.6K]

Answer:

Explanation:

FDIC gives insurance to depositors. it promises to pay back a certain amount of the deposits of a banks customers in the case where a bank fails. As a result of this insurance banks have a greater incentive to take on more risky projects because they know that their customers would be protected even the project goes sour and the bank fails.

Due to the services of the FDIC, less depositors have lost money when a bank fails because of the insurance services they provide to depositors.

8 0

3 years ago

What impact can good accountability mechanisms have on the admissibility of evidence in court cases? enables encryption of the e

ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

Option A, ENABLES ENCRYPTION OF THE EVIDENCE.

Explanation:

Admissible evidence, in a court of law, is any testimonial, documentary, or tangible evidence that is introduced to a judge or jury to prove a point (put forth by a party to the proceeding) or element in a case.

However, before an evidence can be used in a case, it must be considered admissible. And for an evidence to be admissible, it must be relevant and not excluded by rules of evidence (generally means it must not be prejudicial and must be reliable).

The government can be viewed as mechanism of accountability, particularly from a provider to a purchaser. Thus, a task for regulation is to set norms which would help make that accountability process fair and effective, this is referred to as the mechanism.

A good accountability mechanism is beneficial in the following ways:

* It has impact on admissibility of evidence in court cases.

* it allows nonrepudiation (it means sufficient evidence exists such that a user can not defend an action).

* It enables encryption of the evidence. Encryption means is the process of encoding a message or information in such a way that only authorized parties can access it and unauthorized parties cannot.

Therefore, option A best suits the question, the impact that a good accountability mechanism has on on the admissibility of evidence in court cases is that it ENABLES THE ENCRYPTION OF THE EVIDENCE.

7 0

3 years ago

A justification for job training programs is that they improve worker productivity. Suppose that you are asked to evaluate wheth

patriot [66]

Explanation:

1. The ceterus paribus effect gives us to what extent, the effect of a variable has on another variable, while holding all other factors fixed. Analysing job training of workers on productivity will give us results that are not biased since we will not be taking account of other factor variables in the calculations. When 2 firms are the same in almost every aspect apart from number of hours on training, then we will find out that each firm would have different levels of workers output. So we should know if workers output increases due to job training.

2. When it comes to provision of training, furms do these based on characteristics of the workers. Some of these characteristics are measurable while some are immeasurable

Measurable:

Experience on the job,

Productivity

Level of education,

immeasurable :

Skill set

Vision

Likeliness to bstay at firm

3. Apart from worker characteristics, productivity also depends on other factors one of which is technological change. A technological change can bring about increased efficiency and greater output by the worker. Different firms using different capital and technological combination are quite likely to have different output levels.

4. A positive correlation between job training and productivity cannot be used to ascertain if job training makes worker more efficient this is due to the fact that correlation only tells us if variables are in coexistence. So a positive correlation does not tell us that job training is indeed bringing about changes in the productivity of workers.

8 0

4 years ago

In regards to a Construction Management Class:

makkiz [27]

It can influence it to be better

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As the average income in China continues to increase, explain how the following will change: a. The demand for beef b. The dem

7nadin3 [17]

Answer:

C. increase if beef is a normal good; decrease if rice is an inferior good.

Explanation:

As the average income in China continues to increase, we would expect the demand for beef to increase if beef is a normal good and the demand for rice to decrease if rice is an inferior good.

Normal goods are goods whose demand increase with the increase in income of consumer, however, demand decreases with the decrease in the income of consumer as we know Income is a key factor, which affect the demand of goods and services. Examples of Normal goods are Beef, Pizza, etc.

Inferior goods are goods whoes demand decreases with the increase in income of consumer, however, demand increases with the decrease in the income of consumer. Examples of Inferior goods are Cereal, Rice, non branded noodles etc.

7 0

3 years ago