Answer:
It is a violation of NASD rules against guaranteeing a customer against loss.
Explanation:
In this case the RR is guaranteeing the customer against loss. The customer initially bought the shares for $20 the new price is $10. The RR now coming in to buy the shares above market value is a way to guarantee the customer against loss, and its a NASD violation.
Answer:
Option D
To me, I think option D is the most preferred answer
Answer:
ending work in process and the cost of units transferred out.
Explanation:
In a cost reconciliation schedule, costs accounted for is computed by adding the cost of the ending work in process and the cost of units transferred out.
The cost reconciliation schedule gives the relationship between total costs accounted for and total costs to be accounted for.
When the total costs accounted for equal the total costs to be accounted for, this is a cost reconciliation schedule.
That should be false because it says never and the person is student
The singular thing which is important for modern firms to build and maintain by conducting ethical and transparent transactions is:
<h3>What is Consumer Trust?</h3>
This refers to the belief which a customer has in a particular business, usually because of its ethical and transparent practises.
With this in mind, we can see that if modern firms fail to build this consumer trust, then they stand the risk of losing their customer base to their competition.
Read more about consumer trust here:
brainly.com/question/1872126
