All categories

3 years ago

When faced with a conflict, police officers should?

2 answers:

mihalych1998 [28]3 years ago

4 0

<span>Policy officers should try to de-escalate the situation to avoid violence whenever possible. Therefore, officers should avoid aggressive approaches or intimidation and should instead be non-confrontations. Physical force should be reserved as an absolute last resort.</span>

Elanso [62]3 years ago

4 0

The answer is C. Be calm and nonconfrontational:)

You might be interested in

A day care program frequently has a few parents picking up their children late. In an attempt to curb this, the daycare decides

alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

4) All of the above

Explanation:

The day care program should have rewardedbeing on time to encourage this attitude.

Instead they put a price on being late. As parent considers this price cheap they arrive later to have some extra time beofre picking their childrens

Either the day care program reconsiders the fine policy and moves into a better program to estimulate being on time or it increases the "price" so is more expensive for the parents to come in time rather than paiying their fines.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The primary objective of financial reporting is to provide information:

inna [77]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "B": That is useful in decision making.

Explanation:

Financial reporting is the activity every business organization engages to analyze the current situation of the company's operations to take decisions. The Financial Statements are the core instruments firms review to find out how is the firm performing and what points could be improved to maximize the revenue.

7 0

3 years ago

Crane Corporation is reviewing an investment proposal. The initial cost is $103,400. Estimates of the book value of the investme

navik [9.2K]

a) The cash payback period for Crane Corporation's investment proposal is 3 years.

b) The annual rate of return for the investment is as follows:

Year 1 = 10% ($10,700/$104,500 x 100)

Year 2 = 19% ($13,100/$69,300 x 100)

Year 3 = 33% ($14,000/$42,100 x 100)

Year 4 = 82.5% ($17,400/$21,100 x 100)

Year 5 = 232% ($17,900/$7,700 x 100)

c) The net present value of the investment by Crane Corporation is $30,643.

<h3>Data and Calculations:</h3>

Target rate of return = 11%

Year Initial Cost and Book Value Annual Cash Annual Net

Flows Income

0 $104,500

1 69,300 $45,900 $10,700

2 42,100 40,300 13,100

3 21,100 35,000 14,000

4 7,700 30,800 17,400

5 0 25,600 17,900

The cash payback period is <u>3 years</u> ($104,500 - $45,900 - $40,300 - $35,000).

<h3>Net Present Value:</h3>

Year Annual Cash Flows PV Factor Present Value

0 -$104,500 1 -$104,500

1 $45,900 0.901 $41,356

2 $40,300 0.812 32,724

3 $35,000 0.731 25,585

4 $30,800 0.659 20,297

5 $25,600 0.593 15,181

Net Present value = $30.643

Learn more about the payback period and NPV at brainly.com/question/16999673

#SPJ1

6 0

1 year ago

Suppose a worker in Peru can produce 11 lamps or 4 dressers in a day and a worker in Canada can produce 15 lamps or 6 dressers i

wolverine [178]

Answer:

4/11 and 6/15 dressers.

Explanation:

Absolute advantage is the ability of a country to produce more of a product given the same resources than another country per unit time. It also applies when a country is able to produce same amount of goods with another country given less inputs.

So a country that produces more goods uses a more efficient process to get more output.

In this scenario a worker in Peru can produce 11 lamps or 4 dressers in a day and a worker in Canada can produce 15 lamps or 6 dressers in a day. Canada has absolute advantage in producing lamps and dressers, so importing these items will not be beneficial.

To get a balance where both countries will benefit a lamp will have to go for a ratio of each countrie's product to the opportunity cost.

That is for Peru to produce 4 dressers it will have opportunity cost of 11 lamps. So the ratio is 4/11.

Also for Canada to produce 6 dressers it will have opportunity cost of 15 lamps. So the ratio is 6/15.

Lamp should trade for between 4/11 to 6/15 dressers for both countries to benefit.

4 0

3 years ago

If the United States government raises the income taxes on the wealthiest Americans, while increasing welfare payments to the po

SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer:

(Decrease, Increase)

Explanation:

When the government formulates and implements policies aimed at increasing equality, the society will experience a reduction in the level of efficiency. For example, an increase in income tax on wealthiest Americans, and redistribution of the tax revenue to the poorest Americans would may discourage the wealthy from taking more income-generating activities which create jobs, this is not optimal. At the same time, this policy would reduces the peoples’ incentive to work hard to earn their own money.

5 0

3 years ago