Answer:
Limit access to private information by friending someone
Explanation:
When conducting recruitment of an individual employers sometimes do background checks on the person's social media information.
There however needs to be consideration of the person's privacy in doing this.
There should be use of only publicly available information, background check can be done by a third party that is not making hiring decision, and do not request username and password for social media platforms.
It is not best practice to befriend a person on social media in order to obtain their private information.
The answer is c
i hope that helped
Answer:
The answer is stated below:
Explanation:
The accounting equation is as follows:
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' Equity
Analyzing the transactions:
1. The service is provided to customer on account, which result in increase in assets and the stockholders' equity
So,
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' equity
+ $4,000 = $0 + +$4,000
2. The equipment is purchased by signing a note, which result in increase in liability and also increase in the assets.
So,
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' equity
+ $10,500 = +$10,500 + $0
3. Paid for the advertising, which result in decrease in cash as well as decrease in the equity of the company.
So,
Assets = Liabilities + Stockholders' equity
- $1,200 = $0 + -$1,200
Answer:
hundredth = 40.48 which is 40.8
Quarter = 40.48 which is 40.75
Explanation:
The total number of hours worked in all days of the week for Manson is 40 hours 48 minutes.
In hudredth time the conversion of 40.48 equals 40.8 but in quarter time to round time to nearest quarter hour, we have to round the times within 7 minutes of a 15 minute mark to that 15 minutes. Since 48 minutes are only 3 minutes more than 45 minutes, we round back to 45 minutes which is 0.75 in decimal.
Hence the hundredth hour timing is preferred for Edie Manson because it shows a higher time for hours worked and potentially more pay.
Answer:
The employer will be held liable.
Explanation:
If the external agent brings harm or injury to a third party in the course of an employment, the employer is held liable. When a principal directs an agent to commit for a tort or if the principal is aware of the consequences of carrying the instructions of the agent could cause harm or injure the person, then the principal is liable.
It is called direct liability.
The liability for the intentional tort which is imputed to the principal when the agent acts to further the business of the principal.
The agent is personally liable under the following circumstances :
- Foreign principal
- Agent signs the contract in his own name
- Non-existent principal
- Principal cannot be sued:
- Undisclosed principal
Example :
A credit card company hires a sales person and offers a company van to make sales in that area. The sales person uses the office van to official purposes. But one night, he drove the car to a friend's party and while coming he drove over a pedestrian. In this case, the owner of the company will not be held liable as the sales person uses the company van for his personal use while going out for party with his friends. While causing the accident, the sales person was not not using the office van for official purposes and was not tendering official duties at that time.
