Answer:
B. Holly's statement is normative, but Ben's is positive.
Explanation:
Positive statements are based on objective deduction of what is, or was. It is based on facts. Ben's comment "an increase in the tax on beer will raise its price", is an example of positive statement.
Normative statements are subjective and based on individual values and judgement. In her statement Holly appears to be biased against drinking much. She says "taxes should be increased on beer because college students drink too much." Is a normative statement.
The what-if analysis tool would be the most adequate choice for intricate calculations that need contrived optimization:
b). Scenario manager
- 'What-if analysis tool' is described as the tools that are employed to alter the values present in the cells.
- It is done to observe the effect of changing the values impact the results produced by the used formula.
- The what-if analysis tools have been categorized into three distinct types:
- a). Scenarios.
- b). Goal Seek.
- c). Data Tables.
- As per the question, in order to opt for complex calculations, 'Scenarios' what-if analysis would be most adequate as they examine a number of variables and set of numbers/values that affect the outcome.
Thus, <u>option b</u> is the correct answer.
Learn more about 'what-if tool' here:
brainly.com/question/14830872
Answer and Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below
Cash $46,620
To Notes Receivable $44,400
To Interest receivable ($44,400 × 15% × 120 days ÷ 360 days)
(Being the cash received is recorded)
Here we debited the cash as it increased the assets and at the same time we credited the interest receivable and the note receivable as it decreased the assets
The same is to be considered
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Job 1
Annual Income+ Benefits- (annual housing & utility cost)
78,000+4,000-( 1,350*12)= 65,800
Job 2
Annual Income+ Benefits- (annual housing & utility cost)
100,000+2,500-( 3,150*12)= 64,700
Therefore, job 1 is a better choice