Answer:
alitalia should do the forward hedge to hedge its transaction exposure
Explanation:
Alitalia can construct the money market hedge as follows
1. borrow Euro whose present value is equal to the amount to be paid.
2. convert it to foreign currency at the current spot rate.
3. place it in a deposit
4. make the payment when the deposit reaches maturity
PV of payment = 10000000/1.05
= 9523809.525
converting in to Euro at the spot rate we get 6802721.09 Euros
so Alitalia has to borrow the above amount and convert it and invest it at 5%.
now the payable amount from the loan is 6802721.09(1+0.03) = 7006802.72 Euros
Hence Alitalia has effective managed to locl in a forward rate of 1.427$/euros (10000000/7006802.72)$/euros
Therefore, alitalia should do the forward hedge to hedge its transaction exposure
When a company develops marketing plans, it must consider the weaknesses and reactions of competitors, so that it can identify the action necessary to maintain the company's competitive advantage.
<h3 /><h3>Marketing Plans</h3>
Corresponds to a document that details all the course of action of a company to achieve its marketing objectives, which are related to generating value for its products and services and positioning for the organization.
Therefore, the analysis of the external environment, such as the economy and competitors must be considered, so that the company can identify strategies to carry out the best decision making and maintain the flow of its activities as planned.
Find out more information about marketing plan here:
brainly.com/question/9027729
Answer:
The demand that Le Jouet faces for toy trains in France is less elastic than in Russia.
Explanation:
This is the statement that best describes the panorama that Le Jouet faces in France. When comparing the markets of France and Russia, we learn that the demand for toy trains in France is less elastic than the demand in Russia. Price elasticity refers to a measure of responsiveness of consumers. This measures how responsive consumers are to a price change.
Answer:
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
- The US federal government which had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Explanation:
When unexpected inflation occurs, the usual plan to by Monetary Institutions of a country is raising the interest rates.
By doing that, they want to stop it or slowly decelerate it.
So that it becomes more expensive to take a loan, the idea is to reduce consumption.
In Economics, it's a bad scenario after all. Few winners. Many losers.
So, let's examine them
Winners
- 3rd National, a bank that loaned many people money for home purchases.
At first, The 3rd National is going to be winning since the value of the debt will rise, depending on the type of contract and an increase in the interest rate will demand corrections on the monthly payments. But on the other hand, the number of default clients and overdue installments will raise for sure.
Losers
- Karen, a retired school teacher that relies upon her fixed pension to pay for her expenses.
Inflation reduces the real buying value of her checks. And her pension can't grow otherwise this will feed the inflation too.
- Herb, who keeps his savings in an old coffee can.
Since his money is not invested then He's not having any earning that might give him some compensation. So his money is even more devalued.
- Joy, who has borrowed $40,000 to pay her college education.
Depending on the contract Joy might be sleepless. Either her monthly payments will become more expensive or She may experience difficulties because of the weekly growing prices.
- The US federal government had almost $15 trillion in debt in 2011.
Certainly, the president and his secretary will have to address the fact that due to inflation and the chosen medicine make the nation's debt up to the sky. They must renegotiate the payment deadlines.
Answer:
Option A is correct one.
Competing
Explanation:
When one person seeks to satisfy his or her own interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, that person is using the conflict-handling intention of <u>Competing.</u>
When one person seeks to satisfy his or her interests regardless of the impact on the other parties to the conflict, he is competing. The competition involves authoritative and assertive behaviours.
