Answer:
<h2>Hindsight Bias</h2>
Explanation:
The predisposition of the people to consider the events that have occurred as being more predictable than they actually were prior to the event actually happened. Due to this people often believe after the occurrence of an event that they could have predicted the outcome with high degree of certainty. This bias can cause distortions of memories about what we believed before the event happened. It can lead to overconfidence about the results of the future events. It is visible in judicial systems and and writings of historians.
I’m guessing SURVIVAL because ancestors wouldn’t make sense since the question says they won’t have to focus on finding food.
Answer: this is an example of <u>operant variability.</u>
Explanation:
Operant variability means that results of an operation may vary so responses are sometimes easy to predict, at other times responding seems highly variable, unpredictable, or even random. The inability to predict is generally attributed to ignorance of controlling variables.
Answer:
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the most appropriate action would be to send a copy of the informed consent via facsimile to the subject's wife. After she has had the opportunity to speak to the investigator, she can sign the informed consent and fax it back. Doing so would legally bind the consent form so that the consent is valid.
