1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Galina-37 [17]
3 years ago
6

Why did the Federalists support the ratification of the Constitution?

History
2 answers:
Novosadov [1.4K]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is A) they believed in a strong Federal government.  

<em>The Federalist supported the ratification of the Constitution because they believed in a strong Federal government.  </em>

What the Federalist considered right was a strong government with a strong executive branch that allowed the President to make decisions. The Federalist did not believe that a Bill of Rights was necessary. They thought that a strong Federal government was what the country needed. On the other hand, the anti-federalist considered that a strong Federal government had many risks and they set the example of the monarchy in England. That is why they demanded a Bill of Rights.  

Ilya [14]3 years ago
4 0
The main reason why the Federalists supported the ratification of the Constitution is because "<span>They believed in a strong federal government", since the Articles of Confederation had proven to be far too "weak".</span>
You might be interested in
Which in during principle did Hammurabi's code embody
Scrat [10]
Idk idk idk idk idk idk idk
3 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes american policy towards native american in the late 19th century
Elina [12.6K]
They basically wanted them off "their" lands and they despised the native Americans and really didn't care for the natives .they put them on a reserve and let them live their.<span />
7 0
3 years ago
In Sparta, boys were trained as warriors at age _.
lyudmila [28]

Answer:

7

Explanation:

In Sparta, boys were trained to be warriors at age 7.

7 0
3 years ago
Explain and elaborate on TWO ways in which life in the Soviet Union was improved under Gorbachev, from how life had been under S
Free_Kalibri [48]

Gorbachev's reforms are ultimately responsible for the Soviet collapse, which saw the end of Soviet superpower status, a massive reduction in the Soviet military's size and strength, the unilateral evacuation of all territories in Central and Eastern Europe occupied at great human cost in the Second World War, and a rapidly declining economy fragmented into fifteen separate states. Much of the argument that the Soviet political system and economy needed reform needed change to avoid collapse came directly from him - the phrase "Era of Stagnation" to describe the Brezhnev years is actually a piece of Gorbachev's rhetoric. However there seems to be a strong case (made by Stephen Kotkin in Armageddon Averted), that while the Soviet economy was growing at ever slower rates, and increasingly unable to close the ever-present gap in living standards between the USSR and the West, probably could have continued to muddle on - there was no imminent danger of political and economic collapse in 1985. It's also important to note that Gorbachev's reforms did not cause the collapse of the USSR on purpose, and Gorbachev was always committed to maintaining the union in some reformed shape under an economic system that was still socialist. However, his reforms both began to pick apart the centralized economy without really creating new institutions, which caused severe economic disruptions, and his political reforms unleashed new political movements outside his control, while all of these reforms antagonized more hardline members of the nomenklatura (party establishment). Ultimately he lost control of the situation. The Soviet system was highly-centralized and governed in a top-down approach, and it was Gorbachev who put reforms into motion and also removed members of the Soviet government and Communist party who opposed reforms. Gorbachev's period tends to get divided into roughly three periods: a period of reform, a period of transformation, and a period of collapse. The period of reform lasted roughly from 1985 to 1988, in which Gorbachev and his supporters in the government (notably Eduard Shevardnadze, Gorbachev's foreign minister and the future President of Georgi, and Aleksandr Yakovlev, Gorbachev's ally on the Politburo and the intellectual driver of reforms) tried a mixture of moderate reforms and moral suasion to revitalize the Soviet economy as it was, echoing Khrushchev's reforms of 20 years previous. While the goal was a revitalization of Soviet society and the economy, there was a very strong focus on morality: this period notably featured the anti-alcoholism/prohibition campaign, and very public campaigns against corruption (Dmitry Furman called this a "sort of Marxist Protestantism"). When these efforts did not secure the results that Gorbachev and his reformers desired, more far-reaching reforms were pursued in the 1988-1990 period. This is when Gorbachev made massive changes to Soviet foreign policy, such as withdrawing from Afghanistan in 1989, announcing unilateral cuts to military spending and forces at the UN in 1988, and more or less cutting the USSR's Eastern European satellite states in 1989. On the domestic sphere, this is when Gorbachev pushed through major political changes to the Soviet system, pushing through a new Congress of People's Deputies to be filled through semi-free elections, removing the Communist Party's monopoly of power and creating the office of President of the USSR for himself in 1990. This is also the period when glasnost ("openness", ie the lifting of censorship) took off, and these all were largely attempts to establish a new base of support for continued reforms once it became clear to Gorbachev that most of the Communist Party was uninterested in this. These reforms ushered in the 1990-1991 chaos, at which point Gorbachev essentially lost control. Falling oil prices and the crackdown on alcohol sales (which were a massive part of the Soviet budget), plus Gorbachev's loosening of management and sales restrictions on state firms while maintaining most of their subsidies, plus plans for importing of new Western machine tools and technology to revitalize the economy, seriously destabilized the Soviet budget, and caused the government to turn to the printing presses to cover ever increasing deficits.

6 0
1 year ago
What was the natchez uprising ?
Mnenie [13.5K]
It was in 1941 and 1943
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In which christain text are the teachings of Jesus recorded
    15·2 answers
  • What caused the 30 year war in Europe ?
    15·1 answer
  • How technological innovation has affected society
    15·1 answer
  • The first great german expressionist film was ________.
    14·2 answers
  • 1. How many states participated in the Constitutional Convention?
    9·1 answer
  • What is the difference between Spanish and Latin American foods
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an achievement of the Olmec Civilization?
    15·1 answer
  • Use what you've read in the passage to answer this question.
    11·1 answer
  • Match the factors of production with their role in the production and distribution of goods and services.
    7·1 answer
  • Due to rapid urbanization in North African cities, many migrants have been forced to live in
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!