Answer:
Answer for the question:
contributed a lot of money to charity this year (and have receipt documentation for all contributions). I’m such a nice guy! I gave $1,220 in cash to the March of Dimes. I contributed some of my old furniture to the church. It was some good stuff! I contributed a red velvet couch and my old recliner. The furniture is considered vintage and is worth $6,100 today (the appraiser surprised me!), even though I only paid $1,220 for it back in the day. When I contributed the furniture, the pastor said he didn’t like the fabric and was going to sell the furniture to pay for some more pews in the church. Oh well, some people just have no taste, right? Roca Cola had a charity drive for the United Way this year and I contributed $222. Turns out, I don’t even miss it, because Roca Cola takes it right off my paycheck every month . . . $37 a month starting in July. My pay stub verifies that I contributed the $222 to the United Way. Oh, one other bit of charity from me this year. An old buddy of mine was down on his luck. He lost his job and his house. I gave him $610 to help him out.
Is given in the attachment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option e is the correct approach.
Explanation:
- The possibility that a person or, in particular, a corporation will not be able to meet its financial. Bankruptcy risk goes up if the entity or company seems to have no working capital or handles its finances poorly. Financial institutions evaluate the possibility of bankruptcy before deciding whether to offer a loan. It is often referred to as insolvency risk.
- The FI seems to be an organization that serves as an agent amongst involved individuals to a financial exchange, including financial institutions, hedge banks, mutual funds as well as private investors.
Other decisions are taken aren't relevant to the situation. So that alternative e was its right one.
Answer:
<em>(1) Financial</em>
<em>(2) Environmental and</em>
<em>(3) Social factors</em>
Explanation:
A corporation should focus towards giving its best in the 3 respective areas of <em>Financial, Environmental and Social factors </em>as per <em>Elkington</em>.
<em>(1) </em><u><em>Financial factors</em></u>
A company should thrive towards achieving better profit, sales and reducing its debt over the period of time etc.
<em>(2) </em><u><em>Environmental factors</em></u>
A company should perform its operations in such a way that it doesn't impact the environment i.e. it doesn't cause material air, water and soil pollution and large deforestation etc.
<em>(3) </em><em><u>Social factors</u></em>
Adhering to the concept of <em>Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)</em> is important, as it relates to taking care of the people. Giving charity and donations and proper and fair treatment of employees etc. are the areas which are looked upon in this.
<u><em></em></u>
A. Adam Smith, Father of Modern Economics," believed that competition is a regulatory force. He argues that keeps self-interest at bay by restraining the ability to take advantage of consumers.
B. Friedrich Von Hayek, often called F.A. Hayek, believed that less government intervention gives people more economic freedom. He wrote about it in his pamphlet, "Economic Freedom and Representative Government."
C. John Maynard Keyness, according to Keynesian economics, one of the tenets of this school of thought is that government intervention is necessary for stability.
D. Milton Friedman (not Friedrich), said that the government's role in the role should be restricted. The government should not control the money supply.