The Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson leads the executive branch on Foreign Policy.
Answer:
Due to their disobedience, the Israelites wandered in the wilderness.
They thought they were going straight to the Promised Land when they crossed the Red Sea into the wilderness. Twelve spies were sent by Moses to explore the land. 10 of the spies said the people there were too strong for them to go there when they returned. The people believed these 10 spies and were afraid to go into the Promised Land like God commanded (Numbers 13 and 14).
After that, God told them they would not enter the Promised Land for 40 years! Except for Joshua and Caleb, all the adults alive at that time died before the Israelites entered the Promised Land. Following their faith in God, these two men led the next generation of Israelites into their new homeland where God gave them their own nation, called Israel.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Pls give brainliest!
Yes prophylactic antibiotics will not be appropriate when the patient is on concurrent immunosuppressive drugs.
More about prophylactic antibiotics:
Antibiotics used prophylactically are those you take to stave off infection. While you have an illness, you often take antibiotics. In some circumstances where there is a high danger of illness, your doctor may prescribe antibiotics in advance to stave off illness.
The majority of the time, those who may benefit from prophylactic antibiotics have conditions that make them more susceptible to contamination during operation than the general public. These include being extremely young or old, not eating well, being obese or diabetic.
Learn more about prophylactic antibiotics here:
brainly.com/question/4107066
#SPJ4
Knowledge-attitude-behavior and model-providing information about drugs were provided. In some surveys conducted, they found out that students who were more knowledgeable about drugs were more likely to be using them. Affective education avoided particular discussion of drugs, worked on values, alternatives, and personal social skills. These attempts were discontinued due to the fact that they were not effective enough and they didn't present a clear enough anti-drug message.<span> </span>
The correct answer is "Should all people late for important meetings ignore crosswalk signals?"
The concept of categorical imperative was developed by the German philosopher <u>Immanuel Kant</u>, as the central concept of his deontology, an aspect of moral philosophy that deals with duties. Kant's goal was to define a way to assess the motivations for human action at all times in life. An imperative would be any proposition that declares a particular action as necessary, based on this notion Kant divides the imperatives into two categories: categorical and hypothetical.
Those maxims that would be acceptable as a universal law, and can be considered adequate motivation for human action, would be categorical imperatives, implying an absolute and unconditional demand. This cannot be disobeyed, no matter the circumstances, being an end in itself, that is, no other purpose can justify disobedience and the categorical imperative needs no other justification. Unlike hypothetical imperatives, which have application when we want to achieve a certain end, for example, if we want to acquire knowledge, it is imperative that we learn. The hypothetical imperative is linked to the end, or the purpose, desired by the one who acts, thus facilitating the decision of what the correct action to take, is hypothetical because, once the agent has no interest in accomplishing that end, or not the necessary action is taken to carry it out, there is no obligation to follow it. In this sense, it is optional and conditioned to our inclinations.
