Answer: The rejection of the claim about aspirin is more significant as compared to that of vitamin C.
It is because the significant level of aspirin is more dangerous as compared to that of vitamin C.
The dosage of aspirin in the bottle must be accurate as compared to that of vitamin C because it would not cause any harm to the body if exceeded the limits.
It would be wise to use smaller significant level for testing the claim about aspirin.
Answer:
<em>c. the causation in fact, but not the proximate cause, of Ethel’s death.</em>
Explanation:
The law includes two forms of causation: <em>cause-in-fact, and cause-in-proximity (or legal). </em>
The "but for" check decides the cause-in-fact: However the outcome would not have happened without the action.
Both requirements should be met for such an action to be considered to cause harm; proximate cause is a legal restriction on cause-in-fact.
Answer:
allows for more specific feedback to enhance performance
Explanation:
Biomechanical principles provides information to enhance performance about the human body. By using biomechanical principles, we can remove stress and pressure on the bones, joints, muscles and ligaments that may cause injuries. By using biomechanical principles, there is great improvement in the performance of athletes and reduced injuries during sports and games.
Answer:
For the first one, id pick all of them
the second one is C
:) have a nice dayyyyy
