I’m assuming you’re talking about the Miranda rights.
He wouldn’t have spoken to them without a lawyer present. He wouldn’t have had to answer any of their questions. He would’ve just kept his mouth shut.
<span>american indian attacks</span>
Answer:
Could you write the proper question?if it is the question then the answer is 40 to 50 million years ago.
Answer: The Europeans saw an opportunity to spread their religion to other places. Finally, the desire for land, wealth, and power were factors encouraging exploration. The European powers were constantly competing with each other for influence.
Explanation: I hope this helps!
Correlative thinking is a species of spontaneous thinking grounded in informal and ad hoc analogical procedures presupposing both association and differentiation.
Thinking that is logical or rational emphasizes the explanatory capacity of physical causes and is based on analytical, dialectical, and analogical argumentation. Chinese thought, in contrast, is based on an analogy type that may be referred to as "correlative thinking." In classical Chinese "cosmologies" as well as, less significantly, among the classical Greeks, correlative thinking refers to the correlation of image or concept clusters linked by meaningful disposition rather than physical causality.
A type of spontaneous thinking known as correlative thinking is based on impromptu and ad hoc analogical methods that assume correlation and difference. Instead of widely held beliefs about causal necessity, this mode of thought uses shared cultural and societal patterns as its regulative aspect.
To learn more about Chinese philosophies here,
brainly.com/question/13803986
#SPJ4
