Answer:
The correct answer is D. It is not correct to try to convince the other person to agree with you when having a meaningful political conversation.
Explanation:
When talking about political issues, they often deal with controversial issues that can turn friendly talk into heated discussion. Therefore, as a way to prevent this, there are certain guidelines that must be taken into account.
Thus, not shouting, speaking personally and contemplating the opinion of the other party are fundamental criteria when it comes to having a serious and friendly political debate. In this way, cordiality regulates the content of the talk, and the acceptance of the thought different from the other (without the need to share it) gives legitimacy to the idea of the other person.
On the other hand, if in the conversation one of the parties tries to convince the other of its ideology, the conversation will most likely fail. This is so because when trying to convince, the other person's belief or conviction is discredited, a question that many people can take as a personal insult. Therefore, it is totally inadvisable to carry out this type of actions.
The answer for this question would be option 1. According to the United States' 1907 Gentleman’s Agreement with Japan, <span>the Japanese government would stop issuing passports to citizens intending to immigrate to the US. This is due to the growing tension between the two countries and that the number of Japanese workers in US had been increasing. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Yes, 6 million people became victims and die in the Holocaust
There is no definite answer an no one is completely sure. The common belief is that <span>Pythagoras proposed it was round, and Aristotle proved it.</span>
