Question

I WILL GIVE YOU BRAINLIEST

Answer 1

Answer:

1. the Albany plan of Union would have established a centralized government to oversee the colonies and to shore up defense for the looming French and Indian War.

2. Ended the french and Indian war and the British Crown formally recognized American independence and ceded most of its territory east of the Mississippi River to the United States

3. The French and Indian War began over the specific issue of whether the upper Ohio River valley was a part of the British Empire, and therefore open for trade and settlement by Virginians and Pennsylvanians, or part of the French Empire. The war included The French, The British, The Iroquois Confederacy, And The Thirteen British colonies (U.S.A)

4. Washington gained valuable military skills during the war, acquiring tactical, strategic, and logistical military experience. He also acquired important political skills in his dealings with the British military establishment and the provincial government.

5. If the outcome of war brings more good than harm, war can be justified; even if the actual reason for war is not a morally acceptable one. ... As long as a war does not injure the innocent and deny other parties these rights, then it should continue and make life worth living for the persecuted people. examples of this are (in self-defense, as long as there is a reasonable possibility of success. Preventive war against a tyrant who is about to attack. War to punish a guilty enemy)

6. The French and Indian War was fought to decide if Britain or France would be the strong power in North America. France and its colonists and Indian allies fought against Britain, its colonists and Indian allies.  The war began with conflicts about land. French explorers had been the first Europeans in the areas around the Great Lakes and the Ohio and Mississippi rivers. France had sent traders and trappers to these territories and had established trading centers there.  Britain claimed the same land.

(This is purely opinion but for me yes i do think it is justifiable because if we look at it like this; you are sitting in a chair minding you own business and then someone decides to push you out of your chair and say "this is my chair you can go over there" would you not be mad? that was the French peoples thinking, that they were pushed out of their seat and wanted it back even if it meant war)

Explanation: