Answer:
Paraphrasing is when you read someone's idea or concept from another source and then put it into your own words. It is perfectly acceptable to paraphrase another author's research IF you cite it and give them proper credit for their ideas--even if those ideas are now in your own words.
Explanation:
Answer:
Order of ideas, tone, and punctuation and phrasing could be revised.
Explanation:
It is known that when giving a presentation or writing an essay, the speaker should convince the public little by little, providing evidence that will support the final hypothesis, in this case, how great Roosevelt was. Due to this, the beginning would be: "Theodore Roosevelt was a great president because..."
Punctuation and phrasing are other issues in the paragraph. Some sentences are too long and carry a lot of information that could be overwhelming for the reader (specially for such a short paragraph.) In example, the phrase "he brought about much-needed social, political, and economic reform" could be written again: "his impact could be seen in almost every aspect of the country, such as in politics, economics, and in society in general."
The first statement could be at the end, like "an equal share of opportunities. Due to this, Roosevelt is the greatest president."
Tone is also important because it seems to be part of an essay or a presentation, so words like "broke up" could be changed for more proper ones.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
A person does not have to directly challenge someone or an authority figure to be considered a hero. A lot of people are heros by helping in the background. For example, someone could be considered heroic for picking up trash, giving to charity, saving an animal or person in need, volunteering to help businesses, etc. Though you may not be considered a hero like in the comic books there are many things an average human can do to be heroic without directly involving themselves in conflict.
The paragraphs beginning with “Greenland’s ice sheet contains-“
“Warmer temperatures in the Arctic-“
and
“According to Morten Olsen”
Answer:
Age differences
Explanation:
The youth is yet to realise that there is a huge difference in what the old man has experienced and what he (the youth) had gone through. The old man had age in his defense
