Words like <em>never, always, everybody, </em>etc. are absolute nouns and adverbs. In argument, these are usually a sign of over-generalization. These words alone cannot be considered as any kind of appeal (emotional, logical or ethical) since these appeals are done depending on how you use these words, not on the meaning of words as stand-alone.
A is wrong because it has Nobody and nothing in the same sentence. That makes the meaning of the sentence confusing because there are too many negatives.
Same goes for B. B has Never and no in it. Double negatives.
<em><u>C is the correct answer.</u></em><em><u /></em><u />
D is wrong because it has Don't which is a contraction for "Do not" and it also has nobody.
Hope that helps :)<em><u>
</u></em>
Answer:
Shack
Explanation:
it is a roughly built hut so calling a house a shack is just wrong
Answer:
Using a causative sentence to describe the situation:
The boxer had his nose broken during a match.
or
The boxer got his nose broken during a match.
Explanation:
<u>The verbs "have" and "get" can be used as causative verbs. That means they can indicate that the subject of the sentence is not the one who performed the action.</u> Mostly, causative verbs are used when we wish to imply that we asked or paid someone else to do something for us. For example:<u> I had my house painted last summer.</u> --> I was not the one who painted the house. I paid someone to do it for me.
Having that in mind, we can take the situation in the question (the boxer whose nose broke during the match) and describe it with causative verbs in the following manner:
The boxer had his nose broken during a match.
or
The boxer got his nose broken during a match.
