Answer:
Sunk-cost fallacy.
Explanation:
The sunk-cost fallacy refers to the behavior done by the individuals when they continue such behavior because they already invested resources on it (time, money, effort).
In this example, <u>Les invested money on the megaphone of root beer,</u> he starts drinking it but <u>he becomes full, nevertheless he keeps drinking it </u>(even when his friend tells him he will get sick) <u>because he "bought it and not going to waste one drop of it"</u>
<u>Less continues drinking the root beer even though he's already full because he thinks he already invested money on buying it.</u>
Thus, this is an example of the sunk-cost fallacy.
The United States should have dropped the atomic bomb due to Truman having very little choice.
Few actions in the were were justifiable. Truman had very little choice because he was faced with the Japanese refusal to surrender. This decision was based of the ( estimated ) half a million allied casualties likely to be caused by invading homeland islands of Japan. Also, there were likely death tests from starvation for Civilians as the war dragged on well into 1946
Strong leadership from king henry
Answer:
The line item veto Act of 1996
Explanation: