It is false, because the law is based on core ideas of ethics, actually. In common law, cases are determined with the help of the past decisions. Those decisions are also based on past decisions and so on. It shows that timeline doesn't matter; what matters is just the rules and principles of law.
if individuals acting in their self-interest produce outcomes that were not part of their intention or design but benefit society as a whole, this is a demonstration of invisible hand.
The metaphor of the "Invisible Hand" refers to the unanticipated societal advantages and public good that result from people acting in their own self-interest. In his book The Wealth of Nations from the eighteenth century, economist Adam Smith is usually credited with popularizing the idea.
The first time Adam Smith used the term "Invisible Hand," he was referring to his observation that money does not exist in a vacuum and that people acting in their own self-interest will eventually behave in the best interests of the larger welfare of society.
To learn more about invisible hand here
brainly.com/question/1056081
#SPJ4
Answer:
Concerns of safety
Explanation:
This makes the most sense in my opinion.
Answer:
Yes, it is considered a legally valid signature. Instead of using the manual method that requires signing the consent form using a pen, the electronic method simply required you to sign your name in full on the tablet and if this is obtained in the right way, it can be seen as legally valid and original for record keeping purposes.
Explanation:
A major reason why farm workers and their families moved to the cities in the 1800s is because the US was undergoing a period of industrialization, and many more jobs were opening up in factories as opposed to farms.
