Answer:
What Is the Law of Supply and Demand?
The law of supply and demand is a theory that explains the interaction between the sellers of a resource and the buyers for that resource. The theory defines the relationship between the price of a given good or product and the willingness of people to either buy or sell it. Generally, as price increases people are willing to supply more and demand less and vice versa when the price falls.
Explanation:
The law of demand says that at higher prices, buyers will demand less of an economic good.
The law of supply says that at higher prices, sellers will supply more of an economic good.
These two laws interact to determine the actual market prices and volume of goods that are traded on a market.
Several independent factors can affect the shape of market supply and demand, influencing both the prices and quantities that we observe in markets.
D because you should always do research upon the topic to get all the facts about the dangers of the canopy roads.
Answer:
I believe it's a unnatural vs natural
Explanation:
A human border is aline that separates 2 political/geographical areas.
like Iraq's border with turkey
and..
a physical boundary is a naturally occurring barrier between 2 or more areas. including oceans , cliffs.
Answer:
Explanation:
Literature allows people to travel through time to understand different aspects of the world like culture, traditions, stories, love, sacrifices, freedom struggles, etc.
Literature provides a path to ideas and imaginations to experience the past historic moments at present time.
Literature mirrors people's emotion, the power of the government, political thinking, society, etc. It reflects humanity and helps to understand each other, conveys messages, ideas, theories, discoveries, and innovations. It helps to figure out what factors make a character decide his/her choices.
According to Collins, literature is like a path used by our ancestors to convey various information from the past that gives an idea of life and death.
This question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Although the leaders of two enemy nations admit to a buildup of their own military forces, each sees the other country's actions as unreasonable and motivated by evil intentions. This situation best illustrates:
the mere exposure effect.
the just-world phenomenon.
mirror-image perceptions.
deindividuation.
social facilitation.
None of the listed answers are correct
Answer:
This situation best illustrates mirror-image perceptions.
Explanation:
The term mirror-image perception refers to the human tendency of viewing others as the enemy, as evil, especially in a situation of conflict. It is called mirror-image because both people or sides involved in the conflict see themselves as good, and the other as the villain. That is precisely the case described in the passage. Both leaders do not see a problem concerning their own buildup of their military forces - they "know" they are doing it for good reasons. But both of them also think that the other leader doing it is a sign of evil intentions on his part.
