This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
¿Sabes identificar las emociones de las personas que te rodean?
¿Cómo lo haces?
Answer: Aunque a veces es difícil, generalemente sí puedo identificar las emociones de quienes me rodean a partir de sus gestos y acciones.
Explanation:
Yo misma suelo intentar ocultar emociones que me hacen sentir vulnerable, como el miedo o la vergüenza. Pero así como yo puedo identificar las emociones de otros a través de sus gestos y acciones, seguramente mis estados de ánimo serán evidentes para quien observa con atención.
Los nervios pueden generar agitación, sudoración, temblor de las manos o cambio en el tono de voz. El enojo puede manifestarse con gestos y miradas que indican ira, e incluso con elevamiento del tono de voz, y el uso de frases agresivas. La alegría puede verse en amplias sonrisas y una fluidez en los movimientos del cuerpo.
Por supuesto, la mejor forma de expresar nuestras emociones es a través del diálogo, no sólo para poder conectarnos unos con otros, sino que además compartir nuestros sentimientos puede ayudarnos a procesarlos.
Answer:
Performance Test
Explanation:
This test was supposed to measure Jacqueline's skills regarding a particular programming language. The test is supposed to show how much she understands of the language, how proficient she is with it, and what she can do within its limitations. It is a test that is most likely design to measure how well she can develop a software with that language, therefore, it is a performance test.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
Well, you own what is in your title, which means your lawn, and sometimes mineral but not always.
<u>Answer:</u>
The middle colony had the extreme favorable land and climate.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The fertile land in these middle colonies made them a good trader among all colonies. It was also known for the 'breadbasket’.
- The main composition of these middle colonies was New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Delaware.
- Due to the immigration in these colonies, there was a diverse religious groups and ethnically secular.
- The major traded goods were iron ore products and the products from cottage industries.
