Answer:
The right option is D.
Explanation:
The Zulus lived in separate clans, without a common leader, similar to the Mongols who also lived in separate clans and were only united under Genghis Khan's rule. Shaka managed to unite his people, and also conquered several other tribes. In a few years, he had over 200.000 new followers coming from his conquests.
The Mongol empire was known for allowing its conquered folks to still keep their lifestyles, as long as they were loyal to them. They did not destroy everything they touched, and only wiped out those clans who directly opposed them.
Shaka was also similar, as his goal was to rule over a vast territory. When he first came to power, his tribe was composed of about 1500 people and even fewer warriors. But by the time of his death, he ruled over about 500.000 people, from all the territories and tribes he conquered.
Shaka had two half brothers, who made at least 2 failed assassination attempts on Shaka. After that, with support from the Mpondo people, Shaka was killed by 3 assassins, in 1828.
This is more of a your type of opinion question. For instance, taxes
will bring in more money for the government, right? However, it will
put a bigger hardship on the lower and middle class. For every action
that happens government wise - it has a reaction.
The answer
would all be up to you, personally and if you think it'd be a good
choice or not. Personally, I think raising taxes won't make that much
of a fix - seeing as the United States is in so much debt. However, the
jobs stimulus packages that are out there are doing great creating
jobs.
Use your best judgement!
i thik this should help
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiscal_policy
Answer:
Bad command could lead to more lives being lost, more soldiers killed, more families in grief.
Explanation:
