The goal of Bill and Melinda Gates is to offer the chance to significantly raise the standard of living for billions of people in poverty, health, and education.
<h3>What is the reason to make Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation successful?</h3>
Great foundations have a goal that aims to solve a significant problem or problem. A foundation may focus on any subjects it chooses, but to be regarded as significant, its goal must be on matters of vital concern.
Thus, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation greatly improves the health, education, and living standards of billions of people, and the achievement of the organization's objective must be due to issues of paramount importance.
Learn more about Bill and Melinda here:
brainly.com/question/24104407
#SPJ1
D.D.He built up a strong navy and army after studying the militaries of Western nations.
Answer: Louis Mallard experienced an internal conflict throughout the story. In the short story, she found herself fighting with her own feelings, between what she should feel/act and what her true feeling are. When Mrs. Mallard is told the news of her husbands death, it seems that she is depressed and grief-stricken
Explanation: The author included it to make the story interesting, a story has to have a conflict to have a solution and for a reader to want to keep reading.
Armand Jean du Plessis, Cardinal-Duke of Richelieu and of Fronsac<span> (</span>French pronunciation: [aʁmɑ̃ ʒɑ̃ dy plɛsi]<span>; 9 September 1585 – 4 December 1642), commonly referred to as </span>Cardinal Richelieu<span> (French: </span>Cardinal de Richelieu [kaʁdinal d(ə) ʁiʃ(ə)ljø]<span>), was a French clergyman, nobleman, and statesman. He was consecrated as a bishop in 1607 and was appointed </span>Foreign Secretary<span> in 1616. Richelieu soon rose in both the Catholic Church and the French government, becoming a </span>cardinal<span> in 1622, and </span>King Louis XIII's<span> chief minister in 1624. He remained in office until his death in 1642; he was succeeded by </span>Cardinal Mazarin<span>, whose career he had fostered.</span>
They ruled that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a "clear and present danger."
