Navigation Acts,<span> in English history, name given to certain parliamentary legislation, more properly called the British Acts of Trade. The acts were an outgrowth of</span>mercantilism<span>, and followed principles laid down by Tudor and early Stuart trade regulations. They had as their purpose the expansion of the English carrying trade, the provision from the colonies of materials England could not produce, and the establishment of colonial markets for English manufactures. The rise of the Dutch carrying trade, which threatened to drive English shipping from the seas, was the immediate cause for the Navigation Act of 1651, and it in turn was a major cause of the First </span>Dutch War<span>. It forbade the importation of plantation commodities of Asia, Africa, and America except in ships owned by Englishmen. European goods could be brought into England and English possessions only in ships belonging to Englishmen, to people of the country where the cargo was produced, or to people of the country receiving first shipment. This piece of Commonwealth legislation was substantially reenacted in the First Navigation Act of 1660 (confirmed 1661). The First Act enumerated such colonial articles as sugar, tobacco, cotton, and indigo; these were to be supplied only to England. This act was expanded and altered by the succeeding Navigation Acts of 1662, 1663, 1670, 1673, and by the Act to Prevent Frauds and Abuses of 1696. In the act of 1663 the important staple principle required that all foreign goods be shipped to the American colonies through English ports. In return for restrictions on manufacturing and the regulation of trade, colonial commodities were often given a monopoly of the English market and preferential tariff treatment. Thus Americans benefited when tobacco cultivation was made illegal within England, and British West Indian planters were aided by high duties on French sugar. But resentments developed. The Molasses Act of 1733, which raised duties on French West Indian sugar, angered Americans by forcing them to buy the more expensive British West Indian sugar. Extensive smuggling resulted. American historians disagree on whether or not the advantages of the acts outweighed the disadvantages from a colonial point of view. It is clear, however, that the acts hindered the development of manufacturing in the colonies and were a focus of the agitation preceding the American Revolution. Vigorous attempts to prevent smuggling in the American colonies after 1765 led to arbitrary seizures of ships and aroused hostility. The legislation had an unfavorable effect on the Channel Islands, Scotland (before the Act of Union of 1707), and especially Ireland, by excluding them from a preferential position within the system. Shaken by the American Revolution, the system, along with mercantilism, fell into decline. The acts were finally repealed in 1849.</span>
This idea that a bill will become a Law, after it most have been presented to the President of the United States and If he approve, he shall sign it belongs to the concept of check and balance.
<h3>What is check and balance?</h3>
This is a constitution principle that enforces a system in which each branch of government has the ability to limit the power of the other branches to prevent too much power in one branch.
This principle also ensures that the separated branches of government are empowered to prevent actions by other branches and are induced to share power. Checks and balances are applied primarily in constitutional governments.
Therefore, the idea that a bill will become a Law, after it most have been presented to the President of the United States and If he approve, he shall sign it belongs to the concept of check and balance.
<span>Cultural relativism also has the peculiar consequence that social reforms of every sort would always be wrong. But in real life, it actually told otherwise. For example, take a look at the French Revolution, when the Government was so corrupted to the point where people became fed up and decided to overrule them. In this case, we can't really say that the social reform is in the wrong side. </span>
Fatuous love includes passion and commitment without intimacy. This sort of love would apply to a "whirlwind" romance where two individuals meet, fall energetically infatuated, and get hitched, all inside half a month, prior to they even have room schedule-wise to know each other well.
This love can go ahead rapidly, as in "love at first sight," and can last a while, yet except if Intimacy creates in the relationship, at that point the relationship will stay youthful and may appear to be disorganized, hyper, and is probably going to end in a disaster.
Trade was established between Tudor England and Mughal India in 1600 when Elizabeth I granted the newly formed East India Company a royal charter by sending precious gifts to the Mughal court of Emperor Akbar the Great