Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964.[1] This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population.
Answer:
To justify the Shining Path’s use of violence to achieve its political objectives.
Explanation:
First, some context: the Shining Path was a revolutionary organization that endorsed employed guerrilla tactics and violent terrorism to overthrow the Peruvian government and establish a communist society.
In the interview, Gonzalo is asked about the people’s war. He discusses two of the aspects of this war. To state it simply, there needs to be change in a government.
This idea is used to promote the Shining Path and “demolish the outmoded Peruvian government.”
Both the House and the Senate are made up out of the members from both the Democratic and the Republican Party. According to these statistics we can see that the minority in the House and the majority in the Senate are from the same political party as the President.
Answer:
Elastic clause
Explanation:
the elastic clause is a statement in the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8) granting Congress the power to pass all laws necessary and proper for carrying out the enumerated list of powers.
Answer:
Civilizations
Explanation:
The more agriculture was being used, the more people came together. Surplus of food, ya know╮(╯▽╰)╭
