1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
wel
3 years ago
11

Argue for and against: Washington was a great general not so much because of his victories but because of his brilliant strategi

c retreats.
History
1 answer:
Ne4ueva [31]3 years ago
3 0

Yes, I agreed that Washington was a great general not so much because of his victories but because of his brilliant strategic retreats.

  • This is because, during the American Revolution War, George Washington fought a total of 17 battles in which he won 6 (35 percent), lost 7 (41 percent), and had a draw 4 times (24 percent).
  • Also, Washington's biggest victory is considered to be the Battle of Trenton, which he won initially, he and his troops then retreated to come back and won finally a week later.
  • They defeated the Hessian mercenaries in that battle.

Hence, in this case, I agreed with the statement in the question.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18376858

You might be interested in
The ______________________ wanted to restore the ______________ of the Roman Catholic Church.
fredd [130]

Answer:

reformation; original simplicity

Explanation:

i just learned bout this in social studies

8 0
3 years ago
Which best describes conservation, as it applies to environmentalism?
Anastasy [175]
The best answer that describes conservation, as it applies to environment is choice B. It states that the economic use of natural resources in a careful, controlled way. Natural resource management includes land, water, soil, plants and animals with a specific focus on managing that affects the quality of life both present and the future.

The answer would be letter B.
6 0
3 years ago
Use the information below to answer the question.
Verdich [7]

Answer:

They are Anti-Federalists and they are afraid of another monarchy.

Explanation:

The anti-federalists wanted power within the states to have more power because they thought that if the central government was stronger, that there might be another monarchy. They just got rid of one.

4 0
3 years ago
HELP MEEEEE IM A WIFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
galben [10]

Answer:

A. The French were unlikely to take Cherokee land.

Explanation:

Hope this helps!

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Confederation Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance in 1787. Under what government did the Confederation Congress exist?
Vlad [161]
I'm pretty sure the Confederation Congress was under the Congress
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A crime of betraying your country's government.
    13·2 answers
  • "what did president franklin
    6·1 answer
  • The name of the younger man who spoke more wisely to Job than his other friends:
    9·1 answer
  • Who replaced Jehoiachin as king?
    13·1 answer
  • During the late 1800s, many new immigrants to the United States came from
    8·2 answers
  • Match these men with the possible description
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements best explains how the undermining of the Geneva Accords and the use of military advisers in So
    14·1 answer
  • What did the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 accomplish?
    11·2 answers
  • Who said it Sam Houston or Lamar? Please hurry
    7·1 answer
  • What types of equality’s exist, according to Abraham Lincoln
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!