Phrenologists did not critically examine their data.
Answer:
Explanation:
I could hear the river and it seemed to be angry.
Answer:
An appellate court can <u>modify</u> a lower court's decision
Explanation:
When a case is tried in a lower court, the losing party is allowed to appeal the lower court's decision if it does not agree with it.
In such instances, the case is then tried in an appellate court. The <u>appellate court, on review of evidence and after hearing the merits of the case, has the power to </u><u>modify</u><u> or reverse the decision of the lower court.</u>
The text is a primary source and gives a cursory information of what happened wit Ashoka and Kalinga.
Explanation:
1 Any primary source is one that has come down to us intact and Ashoka's edicts are one of the few that have.
This edict says that Ashoka was remorseful about the death of many people in Kalinga when he conquered that country.
2 This and many other secondary sources have suggested that this indeed was a terrible war and Ashoka did win it , but at a terrible cost of men from his side and a complete slaughter of the natives.
3 This incident had him change his mind about warfare and he would eventually take up Buddhism too.
I believe the correct answer is a civil offense.
"This bill would allow such acts to be considered a misdemeanor offense.
misdemeanor means a minor offense, so it wouldn't be criminal.
criminal offense is "any offense with malicious intent (motivated my hatred)"
hope this helps you! :-)