Answer:
parol evidence
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the admission of Brogan's testimony is most likely governed by the parol evidence rule. This rule created to prevent a party from introducing evidence before the agreement was made final in order to change the existing contract. Which is what Brogan is doing in this scenario by trying to release evidence about his age before the finalization of the contract.
Answer:
voir dire, limited
Explanation:
Voir Dire is the French word used to refer 'speak the truth'. The phrase 'voir dire' is used in legal terms referring to the procedures of jury trials. The process is the questioning, in which the judge questions the veniremen. Under this oath, the veniremen are required to speak the truth without being biased. This process also helps in knowing that whether the veniremen is guilty or innocent.
The jurors are a body of people who gives verdict without being partial or biased. The jurors take an oath to speak the truth.
During the process of voir dire, jurors have a limited number of peremptory challenges. Peremptory challenges are the right of a defense lawyer to object to the proposed jurors.
The drug prevention has it major limitation and that is: the drug prevention does not clearly states the goal that the drug is trying to achieve. It is the major limitation for this is the question that has always be unclear and unexplained as to how and why should this act be proceeded.
A. Major Ethnic Groups of North Africa
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
I literally just took the quiz and copied all the answers just for YOU! So can you be nice enough to click that thanks button, give me a wonderful rating, and while your at it, you might as well give me the brainliest...thank you sooo much :)
