Answer:
Because they never experienced the violence.
Explanation:
I'm not sure if this is the answer but I think it was because they never experienced the violence that they were giving people. Sorry if this doesn't make sense but I tried. :)
The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
At this moment, America has dug its own grave. We should properly handle the coronavirus incident, but they still allow airplanes to be flown in and out of the state?! What? We should just elect a proper and intellectual president to lead us in our victory towards coronavirus.
Answer:
Enslaved people grew crops for cottage-industry families who no longer had time to work their fields.
Explanation: