I don't think changing seasons can REMOVE CO2 from the air, but I do think instead it could add it to the air. It's a long process that involves several ecosystems and stuff. But, as the climate is getting warmer, ice caps are melting and within these ice caps... there are trapped bubbles of CO2 that are released ( I am not sure if this adds a lot of CO2 to the atmosphere, but I am sure that it does contribute to CO2 concentration).
In relation to your last statement... plant growth would actually reduce CO2 in the air because of the process of photosynthesis. Plants take in CO2 and give out O2 for us to breathe. In turn we conduct cellular respiration in which we take in the O2 and give out the CO2. So, plants are actually one good solution for decreasing CO2 levels.
Predict the long-term effects of these limiting factors on the cricket frog population: If predators continue to increase, then the cricket frog population will deacrease. If pollution continues to increase, then the cricket frog population will increase. If food sources continue to decrease, then the cricket frog population will deacrease.
D. Dominant
It is dominant as...
The white coat alleles are recessive, meaning the black coat would most likely be dominant alleles. Assuming the black coated dog had the alleles of BB, and the white coated dog had the alleles ww, there would be a 100% chance that the offspring would have Bw alleles, where the black coat is dominant, "all the offspring were black".
B = Black, W = White
B B
w Bw Bw
w Bw Bw
The diagram above shows that the offspring would be 100% black coated.
Not sure if you wanted an explanation, but I tried.
